Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

'Mr Harris said the remains had revealed the man was seven feet tall and had approximately size 15 feet and it had been a ritual burial.'

This one says around 6'5 to 7'4 :Ancient 'Kiacatoo Man' reburial today

1 posted on 05/17/2012 11:44:11 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Interesting, Yowie, etc ping.


2 posted on 05/17/2012 11:45:18 PM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theoria
We’re also doing uranium series dating on the bone and that shows they are significantly older again – there’s a difference of about eight to 10,000 years.

Could somebody knowledgeable help me out here? From what little I have read about uranium testing, I did not think it could be done directly to bones, but was done to igneous rock in the vicinity of the bones. And also I was under the impression that the slowness of the half life of most of the uranium cycle's isotopes made made precision to within tens of thousands of years unrealistic.

3 posted on 05/18/2012 12:27:37 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theoria

An Aussie mate of mine, who is part aborigine has told me that it is aborigine tradition not to speak of the dead....so lets whisper on this thread ok?


7 posted on 05/18/2012 1:05:22 AM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theoria
The Commonwealth countries like to call the descendants of their early residents “aboriginal” which is silly unless the current "aborigines" can trace their ancestry to the very “first” occupants of the region they live in—which can never be absolutely verified since conquests and migrations have been a human trait since we booted Neanderthals of their prime real estate.

“Native” doesn't work as it applies to all born in a certain area.
Here, “American Indian” is more accurate even if it was a Columbus gaffe. “Early American” is better but it does not contain the political power of “native” or “earliest” even though both are literally wrong.

So, headlining that the remains of an “Early Australian” (one may even add “very early”) were found would be true journalism.

picking nits can be fun

10 posted on 05/18/2012 2:55:08 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Biden and Obama--funny ha ha and funny queer.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theoria

What I find interesting about all these very ancient skeletons is how big they were.


11 posted on 05/18/2012 5:18:10 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theoria

I personally believe we all migrated out of Sweden.

As those who moved into Africa, their melanin turned their skin dark.


12 posted on 05/18/2012 7:26:40 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Theoria
'First Americans Were Australian'
15 posted on 05/19/2012 5:48:24 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson