Freedom of Speech , the Right to Bear Arms and own private property. ALL of these rights are necessary for freedom.
Political Correctness and Hate Speech Laws are unconstitutional-—were ideas of Mao and Marxists to destroy freedom of speech and make brainwashing and conditioning into “group think”—one Godless way to think about sodomy or race or Capitalism. This control of language will determine worldview (Wittgenstein). They make words like Tolerance into Virtue-—even when it forces tolerance of Evil—which is never a virtue. They make Diversity a Virtue—when disunity is evil for civil society which needs cohesion. They push Multiculturalism as a Virtue-—when some cultures are evil and deserve to be villified-—but we no longer can do that—no longer have freedom of speech-—without being called “Racist’ and condemned in the “free” press which is nothing but a agitprop machine.
Holmes was responsible for the evil concept that forced John Austin’s concept into American Law-—which destroyed Justice. “Law and Morality need to be separated.” It can’t—Just Law (comes from the Virtue, Justice) and Just Law HAS to always promote Virtue (morality)-—that which was expressed in the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle and later by Cicero who established what Just Law was and how necessary Rule of Law is for Freedom and Republics.
Just Law is always moral and promotes the teleological Laws of Nature and Nature’s God. We allowed Holmes and other judges to remove the God who gave us Natural Rights. We need God back-—he is the Standard of Right and Wrong in American Jurisprudence. We threw God out and inserted Barney Frank’s perverted, evil vision of Good and Evil It is unconstitutional.
Well put.
There’s also this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law_in_the_United_States_of_America
Constitutional Originalists are right about 2nd amendment. But probably wrong about the First.
If we can’t bring back dueling, can we at least reverse “Sulivan v. New York Times?”