Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pawlenty? Just my opinion ...

Posted on 06/21/2012 9:10:10 AM PDT by Why So Serious

I have said here before that candidates have to "inspire" voters. Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton, Obama all "inspired" voters. Now I will give you that the top of the ticket should be the inspiration. However, when the top of the ticket fails to inspire [ala McCain], the second person needs to bring some inspiration. Voters need to really love or hate a candidate to get up and vote. "Liking" a candidate is bad. I LOVED Reagan, I HATED Clinton and Obama. I had passion when I voted in those elections. I have never missed an election. But, what about others? I don't get the sense that people are inspired by Romney and that Rubio would add some of the inspiration. I don't get that feeling about Pawlenty. Picking Pawlenty is like picking Biden. He was the second loser in the primary. Is it me, or are other feeling the same way?

Tell me, Rubio, Kasich, and you have my attention.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: 9YearLurker

“Ugh—Rubio is an amnesty-activist, Bush family property, RINO opportunist who left some shady dealings behind in the FL White House and who has significantly less experience than Obama did in 2008.”

All true and not eligible to boot.


21 posted on 06/21/2012 1:31:28 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Why So Serious
They have to fill the wimp quota somehow, especially now that Daniels is out:

Romney will probably go with someone whose record is acceptable to social conservatives but who isn't primarily known as a social conservative. Maybe Portman qualifies. Santorum doesn't.

22 posted on 06/21/2012 1:48:07 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
Dream on wolf - Sarah would never be that POS cult leader same sex marriage baby killing candidates VP. Get this chump, Sarah is not controversial, she is CONSERVATIVE - a new word for you liberal mittbots.

NO one wants the LIAR ROMNEY - you are trying to pick just the right VP - to dress up and sell this evil liberal lying POS.

23 posted on 06/21/2012 4:31:37 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Santorum, the sell out, Santorum taking one for the team, Santorum in the pocket of Romney since 08 ‘trying’ to convince/deceive others that Romney was conservative!!

What a sack of lying sh*t -’anything’ for the team slick rick, LYING through his teeth about conservative NEWT and robbing Newt’s votes by his deception - the Mitt/Rick plan all along and immature sucker voters fell for it! Responsible to giving this nation over to LIBERALISM! Your legacy - FURS!


24 posted on 06/21/2012 4:42:25 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson