Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Roberts did it
The Washington Post ^ | June 28, 2012 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 07/01/2012 7:57:19 PM PDT by trekdown

Obamacare is now essentially upheld. There’s only one way it can be overturned. The same way it was passed — elect a new president and a new Congress. That’s undoubtedly what Roberts is telling the nation: Your job, not mine. I won’t make it easy for you.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: benedictroberts; obamacare; roberts; ropeadope; ropeadoperoberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: trekdown
That’s undoubtedly what Roberts is telling the nation: Your job, not mine.

Then why did Roberts re-write the legislation in the first place?

21 posted on 07/01/2012 8:34:30 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
I am sure all those republicans and Independents will now be voting for Obama since the Supreme Court decision.

My head is going to explode thank goodness I have free health care now. All hail Obama

22 posted on 07/01/2012 8:35:21 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: trekdown
Judicial activism is wrong, whether on the lib side or the conservative side.

4 dissenting justices knew this was judicial activism. An appeals court knew this was judicial activism. We know this is judicial activism. Hell, even the 4 dissenting libs knew this was judicial activism.

Roberts knew the law, none better. He knew this was a commerce clause case, he even said it was, but he amended the law to make it a tax case.

The only ones who don't know that this is judicial activism are the Krauthammers and others who are defending this despicable ruling.

23 posted on 07/01/2012 8:38:26 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica ("We have prepared for the unbeliever, whips and chains and blazing fires!" Koran Sura 76:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhatHead

He has 2 minor children adopted from Central America. The Democrats were researching and questioning their adoption records even when he was up for confirmation. It wouldn’t be a stretch to consider that the Democrats did something or said something to threaten his family.
His switch from “unconstitutional” to “constitutional” at the last minute also suggests he was forced, coerced or just bribed.
I wouldn’t be surprised it if comes out he was threatened, his kids might be deported as illegally adopted, say they were bought from a baby broker, or something like that, in order to force him to change his vote.


24 posted on 07/01/2012 8:39:16 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

List o the senate seat that are contested can be found at WIKIpedia. Good chart. We need to get to work.


25 posted on 07/01/2012 8:41:24 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying then or now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trekdown
Roberts tried to vote "present", but came down on the side of being a partisan and not upholding the Constitution.

Changing his vote alienated the conservatives on the Court, screwing the pooch on protecting his inner Rodney King.

Not upholding the Constitution (what happened to the lack of a severability clause in the legislation) and actively rewriting law from the bench shot his legitimacy and legacy with conservative Americans for years to come.

26 posted on 07/01/2012 8:42:28 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

And Roberts is A D A. He opened a door for congress to pass outlandish laws if they have a tax applied!!!


27 posted on 07/01/2012 8:42:56 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

Well, yes, and no...

“Nope, Roberts nullified the Constitution with this ruling. It will take 2 more Conservatives on the Court to isolate this bastard.”

Right in context but have to think that getting folks that actually read the Constitution on the Court or getting Judges that not only understand the Constitution but rule as such would be a great advance! A very great feat it seems these day... Not sure that we can find the great minds of Scalia or Thomas. Of course the liberals continue to label their opinions as Conservative instead of looking at the ruling.

Until we git rid of the elective “be subservient to the Liberal establishment” we can NOT achieve freedom.

Sometimes I think we are doomed anyway!


28 posted on 07/01/2012 8:43:58 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

well put explanation.


29 posted on 07/01/2012 8:44:17 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
"On July 1, 2005, Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor announced her retirement from the Supreme Court effective upon the confirmation of a successor. President George W. Bush first nominated John Roberts to the vacancy; however, when Chief Justice William Rehnquist died on September 3, Bush withdrew Roberts' nomination to fill O'Connor's seat and instead nominated Roberts to the Chief Justiceship.

On October 3, President Bush nominated Harriet Miers to replace O'Connor. However, Miers withdrew her acceptance of the nomination on October 27 after encountering widespread opposition."

30 posted on 07/01/2012 8:44:51 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Great, another reason to hate Bush. Well, actually, I’m beginning to think that much is deserved! A Republican, progressive Republican, is worse that any other Republican.


31 posted on 07/01/2012 8:50:36 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

AMEN!!


32 posted on 07/01/2012 8:52:57 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

Its not Roberts job to anoint winners and losers based on his thought process. He is to rule over constitutionality. He is epic fail. Some could argue his behavior was treasonous.


33 posted on 07/01/2012 8:54:09 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

“Which moron, Roberts or Obama?”other

Brother of another color.


34 posted on 07/01/2012 9:01:35 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

If Obamacare had been repealed the economy would have responded in a very positive way. Don’t you think the White House would have take all the credit?! How many voters would realize that the resulting resurgence was IN SPITE of the administration.

I would have certainly preferred that it had been repealed, but you look for whatever bright side you can.

If the GOP can retake the Senate and repeal this monstrosity, then we come out of it with a fully repudiated Democratic Party and a Commerce Clause that has been reigned in by the Supreme Court.


35 posted on 07/01/2012 9:08:30 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

We really have to get together and fight this in public opinion! Roberts made a pubic opinion regarding a very political statement! This has transformed the Supreme Court into a Constitutional court into a political court!

We the people still have the final say! It may not be apparent yet, but we do have the power to change not only this ruling but several others of the unconstitutional courts.

While I am livid with this decision, I am open to rebellion.


36 posted on 07/01/2012 9:12:31 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: trekdown
Roberts’s concern was that the court do everything it could to avoid being seen, rightly or wrongly, as high-handedly overturning sweeping legislation passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the president...Roberts should have been concerned with doing his job with intelligence and integrity - not with appearances - life seems to be nothing but a constant replay of ninth grade, with people more worried about who's in the right crowd and what people look like than with substance and genuineness for so many of these ruling types.....

And by the way, the bill passed both houses of congress without a single Republican vote - it was not a bipartisan effort.......

37 posted on 07/01/2012 9:21:17 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trekdown

If the system is “whatever gets elected is constitutional”, then where is the checks and balance?

Especially with nowadays - what gets elected is based on lies.

Thanks Roberts!


38 posted on 07/01/2012 9:28:58 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

That is my suspicion too...


39 posted on 07/01/2012 9:32:20 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

I would not be surprised, given how the thug Obama and his minions act.


40 posted on 07/01/2012 9:32:44 PM PDT by PghBaldy (I eagerly await the next news about the struggles of Elizabeth Sacheen Littlefeather Warren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson