Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Fire it away .......

[Disclaimer: I am trained in Analytical Chemistry, all my professional work is in Molecular Biology.]

1 posted on 07/13/2012 1:03:07 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Sir Napsalot

Did you put this in chat?


53 posted on 07/13/2012 5:55:36 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
Not only is psychology not a science, it is a religion.

Just like Global Warming and Darwinism.

62 posted on 07/13/2012 9:04:07 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
The anti-scientific cast of Freud's mind is clearly indicated by his attempt to bolster his fantasy of the Oedipus complex by a pseudo-scientific theory of the inheritance of impulses from primitive ancestors who murdered their tribal father to acquire his harem of females. When it was pointed out to him that the Lamarkian theory of acquired characteristics was entirely discredited, he querulously replied: "We can't bother with the biologists. We have our own science." - Freud and the Scientific Method

63 posted on 07/13/2012 9:15:11 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

Since psychology is 100% opinion, and devoid of empiracy and objective analysis, there should be no attempt to call it science.

Its just another form of manipulation, seeking to alter reality toward acceptance of grossly deviant behavior, like homosexuality for example.


64 posted on 07/13/2012 9:26:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

While I generally agree with the headline, there is some science beginning to enter the field. People are doing some really interesting work in the areas of functional neuroimaging and neurofeedback these days, and effectively treating ADHD without drugs, helping people with MTBI and even stroke recover, etc.


70 posted on 07/14/2012 3:57:07 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot
Of course it's not a science. Science seeks reproducible results, but it is not at all uncommon or unsurprising for practitioners of psychology to arrive at very different conclusions. And whereas true scientists have recourse to tools and methodology to critically reexamine their respective positions in the case conflicting results, psychologists are quite comfortable with allowing mutually exclusive conclusions to coexist. Two physicists who disagree about the weight of a subatomic particle cannot both be right, but neither of two psychologists with sharply divergent claims about a bed-wetting will necessarily be wrong. In real science, a conflict has to settled to be resolved.

That psychology is rhetorical is proven in the substance of the pudding itself. Whereas, in science, language is a tool of study, it is both object and subject of psychological study. Language is the matter and form of practical psychology. It begins with labeling, proceeds through commentary, and produces declarations.

90 posted on 07/14/2012 3:35:26 PM PDT by Brass Lamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Napsalot

ping


96 posted on 07/15/2012 8:59:35 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson