Posted on 07/14/2012 5:44:08 PM PDT by Kevmo
Unless you use 0.196 M hydrogen peroxide. Then you have plenty of chemical heat.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2905533/posts?page=72#72
Not government. A bunch of physics professors who are already sucking on the government tit. To the tune of $250 Billion.
Those physics professors are smart people who read stories like this about elderly scientists making cold fusion claims they can't back up. They don't want to see money wasted on cranks and a pathological science. It's not a conspiracy. It's sound judgement.
Maybe if the cold fusion cranks repeat it enough times then it will be true.
So, then all the 14,700 times that LENR has been replicated, it was due to H202 at the input?
If we discard all the times it’s been proven to be used as the input, how many LENR experiments have been replicated? Feel free to prove your assertions.
Not necessarily. You're confusing the energy per mole with the rate of reaction. If the reaction runs slowly enough, with only an infinitesimal percentage of the atoms fusing per unit time, then you can have useful energy without blowing up your setup.
That said, I'm still waiting for a LENR demonstration of significant duration ( > 24 hours, minimum, week preferable), done at an independent testing facility.
Just as a reminder, your 14,700 number comes from an obscure Chinese journal and as far as I know there's been no attempt to determine the quality of any of those experiments, which is much more important than quantity.
And remember that when you post in the open, you post to everybody.
Just as a reminder, your 14,700 number comes from an obscure Chinese journal and as far as I know there's been no attempt to determine the quality of any of those experiments, which is much more important than quantity.
And remember that when you post in the open, you post to everybody.
Post the list of all 14,700 and I'll let you know.
Please stop stalking me.
No you won’t. Even if I went to all that trouble, you’d just deliver crickets, you wanker.
Name just one experiment out of the 14,700.
You won’t even go to the trouble of providing the source of the 14,700 claim.
LENR could do the same thing ~ make everything that passed before so irrelevant that in a couple of centuries no one will understand the past.
Newton actually got it wrong ~ in the local system the error is not enough to worry about for most things, but you branch out to considering things in the local group, you have to reference Einstein and others since Newton.
Well, that deadline passed ~ now they're into a scam aren't they?
Since your basic high energy on line storage battery/capacitor system holds about 5.5 hours of juice, you really want to run any test with any equipment that looks kind of like those high energy devices for a much longer time than 5.5 hours.
Like George Miley?
How many decades do we have to carry these guys before somebody gets wise.
Please stop stalking me.
Yes, 14700 times. Jerks like you keep coming up with bowlsheet arguments that draw from clasic fallacies, over and over and over. Is that an example of your ability to reason critically? Scientifically? You’re totally full of bowl sheet.
Jing-tang He
• Nuclear fusion inside condense matters
• Frontiers of Physics in China
Volume 2, Number 1, 96-102, DOI: 10.1007/s11467-007-0005-8
This article describes in detail the nuclear fusion inside condense matters—the Fleischmann-Pons effect, the reproducibility of cold fusions, self-consistency of cold fusions and the possible applications
http://www.boliven.com/publication/10.1007~s11467-007-0005-8?q=(%22David%20J.%20Nagel%22)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.