Posted on 07/31/2012 8:24:25 AM PDT by fishtank
Here's the dilemma:
Talk radio and other parts of the 'conservative' media started defending Mitt Rmoney several weeks ago. IIRC, the first 'defense' was actually made to protect Ann Romney from the "stay-at-home" charge.
So, Rush and Co. are now promoting Rmoney, after they first dismissed him, then they defended him.
I will vote for neither Rmoney or Obama.
I will "wait and see" (WAS). I will vote "none of the above" (NOTA).
If Rmoney wins
AND
governs as a conservative for four years,
THEN
I'll vote to re-elect him in 2016.
Not before.
(Another Freeper mentioned this exact strategy a few weeks ago. I don't remember who it is (apologies), but if they come forward and identify themselves, they'll be known as the author of the WAS ("wait and see") policy.
So you are by default, voting for Obammy?
If I don’t vote for Romney,
then I won’t be voting for 000’s agenda.
There’s no real difference in their TRACK RECORDS.
.
.
.
.
And we should all use DRIP...Don’t Re-elect Incumbent Politicians!!! DRIP!
Pretty funny, thats what the DU/Kos crowd call Romney, Rmoney.
Could it be you have issues with him being rich? Could it be you have issues with capitalism?
&&&
A DU troll?
Excellent and sums up almost the entire situation. I would add supreme court nominations someway.
IB4T”0VFR=1VFO” crowd.
Well, yeah there is.Paulbots don’t get it though. Go hold your breath till nanny gives you your way
Haha.
I challenge you to go through my FR posts and prove that I’m a “Paulbot”.
It’s impossible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.