Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Jersey Casino Suing Gamblers Who Won $1.5 Million, Blames Unshuffled Decks of Cards
ABC News ^ | 8/21/12 | ALYSSA NEWCOMB

Posted on 08/21/2012 8:05:12 PM PDT by Justaham

A New Jersey casino has sued a group of gamblers who won $1.5 million after they allegedly realized the eight decks of cards used in a game of mini baccarat were not preshuffled.

The Golden Nugget in Atlantic City, N.J., filed suit against the gamblers and playing card company Gemaco after 14 players collectively won $1,536,700 in 41 winning hands.

As the same sequence of cards kept appearing April 30, the players increased their bets from $10 to $5,000, the casino alleged.

"The gamblers unlawfully took advantage of the Golden Nugget when they caught onto the pattern and ... by passing money to fellow gamblers in order to place bets in excess of posted betting limits," the casino said in a statement.

In a lawsuit filed in New Jersey Superior Court, the casino cited gambling regulations that state gaming odds must be fair for both sides.

The Golden Nugget is seeking a return of the $558,900 it paid out to several of the players and the nearly $1 million worth of chips.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: casinos; gambling; goldennugget; newjersey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Justaham


21 posted on 08/21/2012 11:55:30 PM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
Its New Jersey! Unfortunately, the casino will win.
22 posted on 08/21/2012 11:55:52 PM PDT by Lockbar (I promise to move fire-wood twice a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

Case dismissed. Shuffle next time, casino.


23 posted on 08/22/2012 12:00:39 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

I’d say “tough luck” to the casino. They won 41 hands and no one at the casino noticed? Not buying it.


24 posted on 08/22/2012 12:28:01 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Election night is 75 days away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham

The people running this casino are idiots as they missed out on a good PR opportunity. People would have flocked to their casino hoping for similar luck and the casino would have quickly made up their losses and then some with all the extra business. Instead, nobody is going to want to play there because they will be afraid of being sued if they win.


25 posted on 08/22/2012 2:14:25 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justaham
state gaming odds must be fair for both sides.

Bwahahahahaaaaa....that is too funny.

26 posted on 08/22/2012 4:59:11 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Courts have invalidated slot machine "jackpot" winnings, due to software errors. In these cases, the gamblers had no way of knowing they were gambling on a "flawed" machine. Even so, the courts ruled in favor of the casino, though it could be argued that the casino hadn't practiced "due diligence" to insure the slot machines were defect-free.

In this case, the casinos are going to argue that the gamblers recognized that there was a pattern of cards being dealt and SHOULD HAVE notified the casino.

Given the history of these court cases, I have a feeling that the casino may very well win.

Don't get me wrong, I think that the casinos should be FORCED to pay out the winnings in all cases, as long as no cheating by the gambler is proven, including in the cases of "software errors."

Mark

27 posted on 08/22/2012 6:57:40 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson