Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury finds Apple's patents valid in Samsung trial
Reuters ^

Posted on 08/24/2012 4:10:12 PM PDT by Perdogg

A U.S. jury on Friday said Samsung Electronics Co Ltd has infringed some of Apple Inc's patents, and that all of those patents are valid.

The verdict in the high-stakes trial between the two tech giants was still being read in a federal courtroom in San Jose, California, and not all of the key legal findings had been announced.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: apple; lawsuit; patents; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: House Atreides

“Yeah!!!! Good news indeed (except for Apple haters of course).”

Sounds like the Democrats after the SCOTUS Obamacare ruling.

Then again, most Apple junkies act just like your average Democrat.


21 posted on 08/24/2012 4:39:11 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Xerox’s suit was dismissed because they took too long to file it. Apple was suing MS at the time and if Xerox sued Apple and won then both Apple and MS would have been liable to Xerox. Interesting enough is that Apple didn’t win the “look and feel” lawsuit against MS. Except for one tiny thing, the trash icon.


22 posted on 08/24/2012 4:40:27 PM PDT by aft_lizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA; Swordmaker
Apple stole the GUI and mouse from Xerox. When are the penalties for THAT?

In 1979, Apple was planning a business computer and arranged a visit with Xerox Parc research center to view some of their experimental technology. It was there they discovered the mouse, invented by Douglas Engelbart while he was working at SRI International (SRI); the mouse had subsequently been incorporated into the graphical user interface (GUI) used on the Xerox Alto. During an interview, Engelbart said "SRI patented the mouse, but they really had no idea of its value. Some years later it was learned that they had licensed it to Apple for something like $40,000."
23 posted on 08/24/2012 4:41:40 PM PDT by PA Engineer (What if the rabbit hole is endless?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I don’t remember a Coke bottle being used in geometry.


24 posted on 08/24/2012 4:41:48 PM PDT by Kaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: null and void

-

COKE should sue Michelle Obama’s butt for stealing the shape of the COKE bottle.

-


25 posted on 08/24/2012 4:42:13 PM PDT by devolve (------------------- ammo bans or limits? - Lee Harvey Oswald only needed 2 or 3 cartridges ---------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The Coca Cola bottle, for example.

Is that a true "patent" or might it be covered by copyright or trademark? Just curious.

26 posted on 08/24/2012 4:42:21 PM PDT by ken in texas (I was taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder to find any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“it’s good news that you can patent a shape?”

I don’t have a problem with that. Ny favorite guitar neck company is Warmoth. Fender said, “You’re making our necks! We’re going to sue.”
Warmoth said, “Yeah, we’re making Fender necks. Can we reach a licensing agreement?” They did. And they still make Fender necks that are better Than real Fender necks! Gibson won over their peghead shape. And that was an international case involving Japanese copies of Gibson guitars. And the copies were very good guitars that cost considerably less than Gibson’s inflated prices.


27 posted on 08/24/2012 4:44:29 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ken in texas

It is a true patent. Patents come in two basic flavors, a utility patent which covers a function action or process, and a design patent which covers, well, design.

A design is the shape and feel of something, a trade dress. The “look” that defines a product line.


28 posted on 08/24/2012 4:48:04 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1313 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Then again, most Apple junkies act just like your average Democrat.

"Most Apple junkies" are probably more conservative than most Microcrap users. If anybody sounds like a "demoncrap", it is those that criticize computer users, just because they can't afford the best!


29 posted on 08/24/2012 4:48:28 PM PDT by WVKayaker (I’m more than happy to accept the dubious honor of being Obama’s “enemy of the week" -Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

Apple knows which of 3-4 hard drives, 2-3 video cards, and controls their BIOS. They have nothing near the variance that the PC has in architecture. The new machines have to be sent to the factory for a ram upgrade.

A $1500 Macbook Pro has parts worth about $500 - 600.

They have the luxury of no competition and only a few new products every year.

How long did it take for window resizing to move from one corner?


30 posted on 08/24/2012 4:49:13 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I may be wrong about this, but my understanding is that patent and trademark law only applies to protection of designs, materials and emblems/shapes to the extent that the holder needs them to identify the unique characteristics of its own product in comparison to other similar products.

Therefore, the protection of the Coca-Cola trademark on the shape of its bottle would only be enforced in terms of its use for other beverages. If a manufacturer of motor oil or laundry detergent, for example, wanted to use the same shape in their bottles and had a brand name that consumers would never confuse with Coca-Cola, then they could probably do it without running into any legal problems.

31 posted on 08/24/2012 4:51:09 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

Nonsense... Visual Studio C# and .Net has it beaten hands down.

Objective - C is nothing but [bracketed macros] or a big watery BM.


32 posted on 08/24/2012 4:52:03 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Yeah right. You are clearly blinded by some weird MS disease. Sheesh. Bigots are a bore.


33 posted on 08/24/2012 4:54:11 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
The new machines have to be sent to the factory for a ram upgrade.

As previously stated, "ignorance is bliss"!

How to Install RAM in Your Apple iMac With Intel Processor


34 posted on 08/24/2012 4:56:21 PM PDT by WVKayaker (I’m more than happy to accept the dubious honor of being Obama’s “enemy of the week" -Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

I’m typing this on a MacBook Pro right now.

I’m only saying they are about 50% over priced.


35 posted on 08/24/2012 4:57:11 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Then again, most Apple junkies act just like your average Democrat.
**********************************************************
Sure. Tell that to Rush Limbaugh.


36 posted on 08/24/2012 4:57:21 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

You may need to learn Objective C. It is the language that the has most interest in the past year, along with Java. But by all means stick to C# - less competition.
BTW, I have seen macros in Objective C in years.


37 posted on 08/24/2012 4:57:36 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

You may need to learn Objective C. It is the language that the has most interest in the past year, along with Java. But by all means stick to C# - less competition.
BTW, I have seen macros in Objective C in years.


38 posted on 08/24/2012 4:57:36 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

“”Most Apple junkies” are probably more conservative than most Microcrap users. If anybody sounds like a “demoncrap”, it is those that criticize computer users, just because they can’t afford the best!”

See what I mean? The exact same snotty condescending attitude you normally see from your average lefty is personified even in conservatives that project from their love of iProducts.

Quite frankly the attitude of that company is as far from conservative as you can get.

Cant win with capitalism, so get the courts (A California one at that) to rig up the market to protect yourself from other products.

All the while telling us how bad those products are! Cant have the plebs making a decision on their own and buying something that isnt from Apple, can we?


39 posted on 08/24/2012 4:57:44 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

haven’t seen macros in years


40 posted on 08/24/2012 4:58:28 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson