Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letter to Commission on Presidential Debates
Article II Super PAC ^ | 08/31/2012 | Article II Super PAC

Posted on 08/31/2012 4:25:24 PM PDT by TexasVoter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: TexasVoter

I read both your Freepmails to me (and others) and you were not clear why/what you were expecting. My post on this thread was clear about my assertions concerning the NBC issue. So far, the courts and the so-called “committee” could care less...but good luck!

JC


41 posted on 09/02/2012 12:29:39 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cracker45

I maintain a FReeper ping list based on posts from folks who seem strongly supportive of Constitutional eligibility. My goal is to raise awareness about the issue and publicize opportunities to help advance that cause.

Most recently, I asked the list to send a message to the Commission on Presidential Debates. The CPD claims to require that all candidates must be a Natural Born Citizen, tho’ there is evidence to suggest that they have no working definition for NBC. The objective is to put the organization and its members on notice that voters are not going to let this issue slide as they did in 2008.

I apologize if my messaging was intrusive or annoying. Please let me know if you do not want to get such pings from me.


42 posted on 09/02/2012 11:16:16 AM PDT by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; seekthetruth

No matter what the rumors are about any candidate, ALL Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates - Obama and Biden, Romney and Ryan (and, yes) Johnson and Goode - should be subjected to the same vetting on all points of Constitutional eligibility for the office of POTUS.

Just as we all must show ID (or submit to a thumbprint!) to cash a check, it is only proper practice to require EVERY contender to the highest office in the land to demonstrate BEFORE THE ELECTION that they are eligible for the office they seek.

Taxpayers fund elections. Our incumbent elected officials SHOULD be accountable to ensure that we are not tricked into voting for any ineligible candidate(s).


43 posted on 09/02/2012 11:27:19 AM PDT by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

No problem FRiend; leave me on your list now that I’m aware of it! I also have an unfavorable opinion of Rubio for #1 or #2 for the same reason, although I would be extremely delighted if he became dingy harry’s replacement, permanently!!

JC


44 posted on 09/03/2012 1:51:53 AM PDT by cracker45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Please contact Butter.


45 posted on 09/03/2012 7:35:09 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1323 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson