[Above My Pay Grade]

She said that there was a warrant for the residence of the alleged drug dealing tenant/daughter’s boyfriend, that she also owned. She NEVER said that the warrant did not cover her personal residence as well. The reporter clearly stated that it did cover both houses.

In context, it seems clear that what the woman was saying is that the alleged drug dealer didn’t live with her, so the warrant only should have included his residence, and not hers.

[JustSayNoToNannies]

She said that there was a warrant for the residence of the alleged drug dealing tenant/daughter’s boyfriend, that she also owned. She NEVER said that the warrant did not cover her personal residence as well.

Nor did she say it did. No evidence there for your claim, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence."

The reporter clearly stated that it did cover both houses.

Stated with no corroborating evidence on display. No evidence there for your claim, "if you watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence."