The address on the warrant was for the boyfriend’s residence.
“Probable cause” was the ‘justification’ used to enter her residence unlawfully.
But thank you for verifying that you believe it’s hunky dory for police to enter houses simply based on ‘probable cause’.
Even the police spokesperson isn’t willing to lie and say they had a warrant, simply “probable cause”.
****
“A spokesperson for the sheriff’s office said they had probable cause to search Hairston’s residence because Thompson’s alleged drug activities were suspected to take place from Hairston’s house on occasion. The home which she rents to Thompson was also searched. “
“The address on the warrant was for the boyfriend’s residence.”
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Watch the video of the local news (at about the 1:46 mark) it is clear that the warrant was for BOTH her tenant’s home and her personal residence.