get jobs
Posted on 09/14/2012 12:49:19 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
If she disrobes in the presence of her entourage, why should she be embarrassed about the general public getting a peek?
The royal porn family
sicko’s should stop being supported by taxpayers and get jobs
it’s 2012.. nobody gives a hang about seeing her topless from a telephoto lens.. we have already seen closeups of Pamela Anderson honking on Tommy Lee’s ankle spanker and the open leg shot of Britney Spear’s whisker biscuit.. a great big whoop on princess Kate’s hoohas .. plus Diana was better looking
I think she’ll be found to be innocent.
Shock? Not so much. I this an attempted to deflect from Harry’s recent bad press. Sorry, as a Mayflower descendant, I have little sympathy for the debauched lives the royals live.
Big deal!
Why are people so freaked out about breasts?
I don’t like the royals, but she is lovely topless and there is nothing vulgar about the pics.
Don’t be a bunch of titsophobes! SHEESH!
Beside Kate's breasts are just about the most perfect in size and shape IMO.
For the record, Ted Kennedy had a bigger cup size.
If the royals find the pictures embarrassing they can fix the problem by changing their behavior. Their failure to modify behavior suggests they are not embarrassed.
This is just more fodder thrown at the masses by the elites to distract the people from the the real horrors being perpetrated on society, the economy, and civilization. Better the steeple satisfy their base desires gawking at nude photos of a princess than contemplate the coming economic collapse.
I doubt she disrobed in the presence of her entourage, but perhaps in the presence of a few close friends.
I have the honour to call myself the friend of a few members of the Royal family - and I call it an honour not because they are royal - although I am a monarchist (and I am a citizen of two constitutional monarchies, so I think I’m allowed to be - in these countries, supporting the monarchy is closely connected to conservatism) - but because they have to be very careful about who they allow to become their friends. There are too many people just trying to gain some benefit from it, they never give it lightly. So if you are a friend, you are a close friend and you are trusted.
There’s a very big difference between letting these people see who you are, and being exposed to the general public.
That said, I think this is a fairly minor issue - it’s not as if the Duchess is being accused of ‘misbehaving’ - these photos were taken by somebody spying on her doing something she had every right to do - relaxing privately in a way she found comfortable.
The behaviour in this case seems to have been discretely sunbathing in a private location on private property.
I don't see any reason the Duchess should not do this if she chooses to.
Shame is with the person who invaded her privacy with a telephoto lens to make some money - and to any media outlets that paid that person for their actions.
I agree with you. Thank you.
It is the photographer who should be ashamed. He was where he could invade their privacy. Are there peeping tom laws applicable here or perhaps stalking? /rhetorical
sicko’s should stop being supported by taxpayers and get jobs
Yeah that damn Harry over in Afghanistan working for his country. What a jerk. William flying planes during war...what a jerk. Come on Geron, I agree with you 99 percent but not this particular post. Big deal about the pictures. She was with her husband on vacation. I think that William and Kate are doing more good than not. Now his father is another story.....
They have jobs - jobs that the Constitutions of eighteen countries require them to do, without even asking them if they want to do them.
It's reasonable to think there's something wrong with the idea of monarchy, but that isn't a decision that is in the hands of the monarch or the members of the Royal family. It's in the hands of Parliaments. The law and constitution as it stands, tells these people - "You have a duty." and I think it's wrong to criticise them for doing the duty that their countries ask of them.
They are also not supported by taxpayers - the revenues of the Crown Estate go to the British Treasury, and the amount of money used to fund the Royal Family is tiny in comparison to those revenues - the only money the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge get from the British taxpayer is Flight Lieutenant Wales' salary as an RAF officer.
Actually, France does have pretty strict privacy laws - and the magazine in this place, can expect to be hit with a large fine. But they will regard it as paying for publicity.
The same goes for the photographer - any money he has to pay out will be less than he's sold the images for.
I didn’t know all that, I guess I always assumed they were supported by the taxpayers too. Thanks for enlightening me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.