Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Good Morning America’ weatherman Sam Champion engaged to longtime boyfriend Rubem Robierb
New York Daily News ^ | October 5, 2012

Posted on 10/05/2012 4:03:13 PM PDT by SMGFan

Good Morning America” weather anchor Sam Champion and his longtime boyfriend Rubem Robierb are engaged to be married. “We are thrilled and so excited and thank everyone for their good wishes,” Champion said. “I’ve never been happier to share a bit of personal news,” he tweeted.

Champion and Robierb met through mutual friends a few years ago in Miami, where Robierb lives. Robierb, who was born in Brazil, is a fine-arts photographer who shows his work in Miami, Atlanta, Santa Monica and New York. The two plan to wed later this year — possibly on New Year's Eve.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lavendermafia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Ohiobelle

Lib Lurker


42 posted on 10/05/2012 5:19:59 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

Not everybody that gets married has kids. This world is over populated anyways. We should not be looking to compete with China in this department.


43 posted on 10/05/2012 5:22:36 PM PDT by Ohiobelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

She already chose.


44 posted on 10/05/2012 5:22:59 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle

ROFLOL


45 posted on 10/05/2012 5:23:58 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle

” ...not moving us forward.”

I consider this a “tell.”

I don’t give a damn if two women or two men want to engage in sodomy in private, but don’t refer to it as marriage—it can be a “civil union”, it can be a “butt-party”, it can be a “homo-coupling” -call it anything you like, but it ISN’T “marriage”, and if those who demand it BE referred to as “marriage” keep up this ignorant, intolerant rant, it becomes more and more obvious that the comment is more “political” than emotional.

“lean forward” if you wish, Ohiobelle, but quit co-opting language to suit perverted stances.


46 posted on 10/05/2012 5:24:07 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: twister881; Ohiobelle
Lib Lurker

Who has the authority to call out the kitties?

47 posted on 10/05/2012 5:24:20 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: twister881

48 posted on 10/05/2012 5:24:55 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle

I really, REALLY hope that you’re under age 25. (I’d like to say 21, but that would be optimistic.)

If you’re any older than 25, you are lost, and it will only be all the more difficult for you as time goes on.


49 posted on 10/05/2012 5:25:04 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle

You are making an assumption that marriage should be any two people. Who are you to judge those who wish to live in polygamy, for example? You are not adhering to your own standards. You would define marriage as any two people. Your definition also discriminates against some people. Why would you limit marriage to just two?

On the one hand, you say that nobody has a right to tell anyone who they can or can’t marry, but on the other hand, you apparently want to see marriage defined in a certain way. Those who wish to preserve traditional marriage also want to see marriage defined in a certain way. You have a lot in common with the marriage traditionalists.


50 posted on 10/05/2012 5:29:21 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle
You are definitely on the wrong site... Maybe you should read what it says on the FR homepage.








51 posted on 10/05/2012 5:29:45 PM PDT by Bikkuri (Hope for Conservative push in the next 2-4 years..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle

Your Mommy is calling you. It’s time to put on your jammies and snuggle with Buddy Bear.


52 posted on 10/05/2012 5:31:14 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle
I don’t think our government has any right EVER to tell somebody they can’t get married! If you don’t agree thats your problem!

So if my mother and I decide to marry each other, you would have no problem with that?

This is NOT an issue of "rights". There is no "right" to marry.

Marriage is classically an obligation two people undertook prior to engaging in activity likely to yield children.

A homosexual couple cannot possibly produce children; therefore, the concept of "marriage" of two homosexuals is null and void.

53 posted on 10/05/2012 5:33:22 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle; Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator
Oh, forgot to wake up our friends..


IBTZ
54 posted on 10/05/2012 5:33:38 PM PDT by Bikkuri (Hope for Conservative push in the next 2-4 years..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Name calling hahaha. Let me give you some ammo. I am so far right that I can’t even see the center anymore. However... I could careless if women get abortions but I am not paying for it! I don’t hug a bible I don’t own, and believe me when I say the 2nd amendment will always have my back! Most importantly we have no right to judge others because they choose same sex relationships!!


55 posted on 10/05/2012 5:33:52 PM PDT by Ohiobelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Hate to be picky here, but last I checked there’s no cervix or uterus attached to a man’s colon. As such, how do you consumate a same sex marriage?

Like most normal people, I don't want to think about it. It's the kind of thing that creeps out normal people, especially children who are naturally - - instinctively - - creeped out by homosexuality, despite all the best efforts of the liberal Democrat government schools to change human nature.

You'll have to ask a homo.

56 posted on 10/05/2012 5:34:24 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle

Well dear Ohiobelle, these two can fornicate all they like. marriage is a sacrement between a man and a woman.

Perverts can come up with whatever they want as long as it is not called marriage.


57 posted on 10/05/2012 5:36:12 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Good questions. More questions...What are "rights" anyway? Where do "rights" come from? If homosexual "marriage" is a "right," shouldn't it be obvious to everyone that rights are being trampled? Why have they waited until this point in time to claim their "rights"? Not that long ago, sodomy was a crime. Why was it against the law?

There has not been a civilization yet that has survived sexual licentiousness. Homosexual "marriage" is not the cause of the decline of Western civilization, but it is a symptom and in the big picture this will not end well. Marriage is about a lot more than who you like.

58 posted on 10/05/2012 5:36:36 PM PDT by informavoracious (Abortions are unproductive wrongs, not reproductive rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle
If you work really really fast you can provide that source you were holding out on before. ;^)

If you have info to the contrary I'd love to see your source...

59 posted on 10/05/2012 5:36:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ohiobelle; PJBankard; scottjewell; ebb tide; Sirius Lee; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; ...
Ohiobelle wrote:
Marriage is between two people that love eachother.
So twins can marry each other? What about triplets? And what age limits ought to exist? And who decides? You? What makes you so special?
60 posted on 10/05/2012 5:36:54 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson