Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OK that was pretty stupid. When is the next debate?
(vanity)

Posted on 10/17/2012 5:43:44 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network

I mean what are we wasting our breath about?

A biased debate "moderator", holds a meaningless debate.

Blah blah blah.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2012debates; misc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Forget it.

There is another debate.

Forget this one. It was meaningless. When is the final debate, and who is the moderator?

That one, may matter.

1 posted on 10/17/2012 5:43:47 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

That this country should stage these phony, biased “debates” for the entertainment of the Leftist media is an embarrassment. We know we will be on the road back to political soundness when these dog-and-pony shows are dropped.


2 posted on 10/17/2012 5:48:30 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
OK that was pretty stupid. When is the next debate?

This whole debate syndrome is pure crap. Actually Romney did pretty well against a tsunami of BULLSHIT and obviously biased "monitoring" by the "sweat hog", Crowley.

3 posted on 10/17/2012 5:48:49 AM PDT by GoldenPup (Comrade "O" has got to GO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
When is the next debate?

Why would you want more of these rigged "debates"? These so-called "debates" are run by the disinformation arm of Obama's Reelection Committee AKA the MSM. They're set up to fool the gullible and keep the real issues as far away from Obama as the east is from the west.

4 posted on 10/17/2012 5:50:00 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Why do the American voters only get liberal moderators at liberal voter stacked townhall debates?

Why no Fox moderators?

Looks like we "settle for" a lot more than a bad president.
5 posted on 10/17/2012 5:52:18 AM PDT by John 3_19-21 (Desperation leads to curious events)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Our son called this AM to discuss the debate. I told him the whole biased media, questions, and audience had me spitting nails mad. He agreed, but told me I was just as biased to the right, so get over it, and hope the best for Mitt next Monday.


6 posted on 10/17/2012 5:52:26 AM PDT by raisincane (I'm an optimist...Romney will beat the zero in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Anout all I got out of it is was that Romney could kick that twerps butt in a brawl.....perhaps the next debate will have more substance ( if I watch at all).


7 posted on 10/17/2012 5:55:16 AM PDT by Michigander222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raisincane

Romney is about jobs.

That is what you should be telling your son.

Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.


8 posted on 10/17/2012 5:58:18 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Give a libtard enough rope...


9 posted on 10/17/2012 5:59:46 AM PDT by Leep (Forward! to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldenPup

Romney didn’t lose any points at all last night & probably gained some in spite of the crappy debate set up. Thats all he has to do from here until Nov 6.


10 posted on 10/17/2012 5:59:46 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
>"who is the moderator?"

Raging Socialist #3.

11 posted on 10/17/2012 6:00:13 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
My take, in the most biased, stacked up debate format with the most biased moderator, Romney held his own against Obama.

The next debate is on foreign policy. Can anyone outline what Obama might consider a foreign policy success? Osama bin Ladin? and????

12 posted on 10/17/2012 6:01:17 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Bob Schieffer, he’ll try to get a foreign policy gaffe out of Romney and to keep Obama from a gaffe.
But a male moderator is hard for Obama to deal with. He has issues with males and feels much more secure in a confrontation with a ‘mother’ there.

Expect slight Romney win.


13 posted on 10/17/2012 6:03:34 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

The good news is more people many times over will be checking in to the Drudge Report today than will be tuning into CNN or MSNBC.


14 posted on 10/17/2012 6:03:34 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

it;’s like having a debate with Mark Levin moderatiing , being held down in SC and so caleld SC undecideds.

Questions, how are you different from Bush, I don;t think the last 4 years is because of oabma and it;s because of Bush and overseas issues.
WTH

Then women’s pay, I;ve asked my wife and she said not one woman ever talks abotu that nor getting someone to pay for their pills or condoms and my wife said she is insulted that the left seem to think women only want free condoms and abortion.

Then the question of AK 47’s

GIVE ME A BREAK but then the moderator butting in to Romney over fast and furious, China, obama;s investments etc.


15 posted on 10/17/2012 6:03:42 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Monday-Foreign Policy Debate-that old dude from Slay The Nation.
16 posted on 10/17/2012 6:04:45 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raisincane

you need a strong word with your son[smiles]

Tell him why does he refuse to say more on food stmaps is bad etc


17 posted on 10/17/2012 6:05:54 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

>> Osama bin Ladin? and????

“I said we’d get the troops out of Iraq, and we did.”

Some vague hopey changey stuff about Afghanistan

“My FBI will bring those who killed our ambassador to justice”, and the unsaid implication that he got Bin Ladin so he has a track record of doing that sort of thing

We’ve heard it all in the other two debates.

Now... list Barky’s foreign policy MIS-STEPS!


18 posted on 10/17/2012 6:09:02 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

agreed Romney with a staged biased crowd, biased questions and a moderator who was clearly ut there to defend oabma much like the last one defending Biden.

I’ve already seen a couple of trolls on here saying we lost, we should suck it up Romney was awful and need to move on as we’ll suffer in the polls.

Beware of the trolls on here as they’re out and about on here and your local papers, FB etc.


19 posted on 10/17/2012 6:09:10 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Put the debate candidates in game-show style sound proof booths. Each can hear the other.

The entire process is computer automated. Questions flash on a screen, a timer makes the the microphone “hot” for 3 minutes, then switches to the opponent for 3 minutes of rebuttal.

Then, all mics off, and a new question...same time limits.

It would stop the interruptions and make debaters use their time wisely, and stay on subject.

Also, there would be no live (liberal) moderators to aid and abet the dem candidate.


20 posted on 10/17/2012 6:11:34 AM PDT by FrankR (They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson