Skip to comments.Is the GOP Headed for the Boneyard?
Posted on 11/10/2012 8:58:22 PM PST by River Hawk
After its second defeat at the hands of Barack Obama, under whom unemployment has never been lower than the day George W. Bush left office, the Republican Party has at last awakened to its existential crisis.
Eighteen states have voted Democratic in six straight elections. Among the six are four of our most populous: New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois and California. And Obama has now won two of the three remaining mega-states, Ohio and Florida, twice.
Only Texas remains secure -- for now.
At the presidential level, the Republican Party is at death's door.
Yet one already sees the same physicians writing prescriptions for the same drugs that have been killing the GOP since W's dad got the smallest share of the vote by a Republican candidate since William Howard Taft in 1912.
In ascertaining the cause of the GOP's critical condition, let us use Occam's razor -- the principle that the simplest explanation is often the right one.
Would the GOP wipeout in those heavily Catholic, ethnic, socially conservative, blue-collar bastions of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio and Illinois, which Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan swept, have anything to do with the fact that the United States since 2000 has lost 6 million manufacturing jobs and 55,000 factories?
Where did all those jobs and factories go? We know where.
They were outsourced. And in the deindustrialization of America, the Republican Party has been a culpable co-conspirator.
Unlike family patriarch Sen. Prescott Bush, who voted with Barry Goldwater and Strom Thurmond against JFK's free-trade deal, Bush I and II pumped for NAFTA, GATT, the WTO and opening America's borders to all goods made by our new friends in the People's Republic of China.
Swiftly, U.S. multinationals shut factories here, laid off workers, outsourced production to Asia and China, and brought their finished goods back, tax-free, to sell in the U.S.A.
Profits soared, as did the salaries of the outsourcing executives.
And their former workers? They headed for the service sector, along with their wives, to keep up on the mortgage payment, keep the kids in Catholic school and pay for the health insurance the family had lost.
Tuesday, these ex-Reagan Democrats came out to vote against some guy from Bain Capital they had been told in ads all summer was a big-time outsourcer who wrote in 2008, "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt!"
Yes, the simplest explanation is often the right one.
Republicans are also falling all over one another to express a love of Hispanics, after Mitt won only 27 percent of a Hispanic vote that is now 10 percent of the national vote.
We face demographic disaster, they are wailing. We must win a larger share of the Hispanic vote or we are doomed.
And what is the proposed solution to the GOP's Hispanic problem, coming even from those supposedly on the realistic right?
Amnesty for the illegals! Stop talking about a border fence and self-deportation. Drop the employer sanctions. Make the GOP a welcoming party.
And what might be problematic about following this advice?
First, it will enrage populist conservatives who supported the GOP because they believed the party's pledges to oppose amnesty, secure the border and stop illegals from taking jobs from Americans.
And in return for double-crossing these folks and losing their votes, what would be gained by amnesty for, say, 10 million illegal aliens?
Assume in a decade all 10 million became citizens and voted like the Hispanics, black folks and Asians already here. The best the GOP could expect -- the Bush share in 2004 -- would be 40 percent, or 4 million of those votes.
But if Tuesday's percentages held, Democrats would get not just 6 million, but 7 million new votes to the GOP's less than 3 million.
Thus, if we assume the percentages of the last three elections hold, the Democratic Party would eventually gain from an amnesty a net of between 2 and 4 million new voters.
Easy to understand why Democrats are for this. But why would a Republican Party that is not suicidally inclined favor it?
Still, the GOP crisis is not so much illegal as legal immigration. Forty million legal immigrants have arrived in recent decades. Some 85 percent come from Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East. Most arrived lacking the academic, language and labor skills to compete for high-paying jobs.
What does government do for them?
Subsidizes their housing and provides free education for their kids from Head Start through K-12, plus food stamps and school lunches, Pell Grants and student loans for college, Medicaid if they are sick, earned income tax credits if they work and 99 weeks of unemployment checks if they lose their job.
These are people who depend upon government.
Why would they vote for a party that is going to cut taxes they do not pay, but take away government benefits they do receive?
Again it needs be said. When the country looks like California demographically, it will look like California politically. Republicans are not whistling past the graveyard. They are right at the entrance.
Yes, by the look of things the GOP is headed to the Boehnyard.
Well, it seems to have already arrived there.
There is still 2014 and 2016.
2014 will determine whether the GOP is Boneyard bound. We will have to retain solid control of the House and maybe gain a majority in the Senate (if possible, and it depends on which seats are up for re-election).
Right next to free elections and our once free republic!
Our side elected Romney yet we have all Bama for a second term someone cheated where the GOP hiding under the boneyard we need them now front and center
I think it’s more likely that the conservative movement is headed for the boneyard actually. The GOP will adapt to this brave new world the left has created and eventually return to power with a more moderate base. The old guard, in the meantime, will wither and wane and watch as the world goes to hell in a handbasket.
great analysis. the history of “amnesty” is very clear. but can the lemmings, i mean the GOPe, stop themselves.
no matter what they do, conservatives have some lessons too. we are already unified under God and His principles masterfully laid down in our founding documents.
but we have to work to unify conservatives behind one party, lead by one leader, offering one slate. hint: secularism (apologies for God), coercion, bipartisanship, ignorance, ignorance of principle, appeals to fear, pandering to race, etc. will not work to unify conservatives, although they are the bread and butter of democrat unity.
and another thing. our decision process should not be modelled like the republican primary system which is set up to destroy conservative unity. we could use a separate system that feeds one conservative candidate for each office into the republican primary (or democrat primary if in a conservative district) assuming that there is still no national conservative party by that time.
“The GOP will adapt to this brave new world the left has created and eventually return to power with a more moderate base. “
You could’ve said that in 2008. But they lost.
Epitaph should be “Death By Leftism”.
Yes, It’s a serious crisis for conservative moment.
“the conservative movement is headed for the boneyard actually.”
No, and I’ll explain to you why. Conservativism is the idea that men and women do best when they are able to rely on themselves and they can contribute to the economy based on their efforts. It is based on principles, not politics, not the number of votes in the election.
If you want the door - walk through it - it’s wide open for you - but you won’t like the door and you won’t like where you end up.
The demographic issue has finally caught up to us too. Hispanics, though probably quite conservative in nature, are perfectly willing to vote for socialists if it allows them to achieve their goal of amnesty. Listening to our own leaders tonight, it is clear that they are willing to put that amnesty on the table and we all know why, they want the cheap labor. They don't need to be a majority power to reap the benefits of that policy, they just need a plausible excuse and now they have it, we have to "woo the hispanics" which really just amounts to further balkanization of the US. That will result in race based politics (it already has obviously) and the democrats have recently demonstrated their mastery of exploiting that balkanization. It truly was a disgusting spectacle.
this will, of course, increase the number of dependent type people i.e. the democrat voter base. It's one more card in the deck stacked against us and they'll spend the next four years stacking that deck even more.
then there's the economy. It isn't going to improve. the ranks of the poor will continue to swell and the democratic party will be right there to promise them a share of the booty picked from the pockets of the productive members of society. It's a deal they can't refuse.
the writing is on the wall. This election is going to have far reaching consequences, guaranteed.America is f*cked. The reason for the second amendment is becoming increasingly clear.
בְּתוֹךְ הַבִּקְעָה וְהִיא מְלֵאָה עֲצָמוֹת*
Discern what you will but with the Weeper of the House overseeing the Boehner- boneyard, might as well call this valley of bones the Valley of Weeping.
I say it because I used to be a pro-abort globalist liberal, oh, say 12 years ago.
I was won over by the facts and the evidence which is overwhelmingly in favor of conservativism. I was won over by the words of Reagan when he talks about the desires of conservatives to better themselves and others. I was won over reading the response of English conservatives to the French Revolution.
This is not a new battle. Imagine how the folks in England felt when France went into revolution? Did they quit? Did they end up fighting France for close to 20 years before they finally prevailed at Waterloo?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.