Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the GOP Won't Admit Supply-Side Econ Has Failed
The Fiscal Times ^ | 12/4/2012 | Mark Thoma

Posted on 12/04/2012 8:25:22 AM PST by ksen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last
To: ksen
Then maybe it’s also not a coincidence that GDP growth has slowly been declining since marginal rates have been trending down.

Since when have marginal rates been trending down?

81 posted on 12/04/2012 12:53:11 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Behind the Blue Wall
Since when have marginal rates been trending down?

Since at least the early 1940s.


82 posted on 12/04/2012 1:06:19 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Doesn’t look like they’re trending down at all. Looks to me like they’ve been level or ticking slightly up for the past 25 years.


83 posted on 12/04/2012 1:24:34 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Ok, first of all, this is a Berkeley guy -- and what's even worse, a Kruggelite -- spitballing about +70 rates.

"For the U.S. economy, the current top income marginal tax rate on earnings is about 42.5 percent, combining the top federal marginal income tax bracket of 35 percent with the Medicare tax and average state taxes on income and sales."

Not once does he make a convincing argument that the above-described paradigm is not the apex of Laffer. His later paralogisms about elasticity are plowed with doubt precisely because he knows capital flight is a given past 50.

The Pareto coefficient chart from 2005 is as much bunk as the global swarming hockey stick graph from 7 years earlier. I find it deeply ironic that morons like Diamond & Mann embrace 'science' but then want everyone to put their 'faith' in absurd, spurious projections.

Flight will proceed in an ellipitical hybrid of lower tax rates traded off against preferred SoL/climate/lifestyle. Singapore, Oz and Korea are the most likely winners, noting Facebook's financial founder Saverin to the former.

Any further questions, look at France. Not an economic or political regime I'd care to emulate...

84 posted on 12/04/2012 1:28:28 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Own It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

You mean the Singapore, Australia, and South Korea that manage to have a more universal healthcare system than the US does and still remain a haven for rich people fleeing the United States?


85 posted on 12/04/2012 1:39:52 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Behind the Blue Wall

I guess if you want to cherry pick the info than sure.


86 posted on 12/04/2012 1:41:20 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: LS; ksen; Darksheare
Wow, seriously? “like communism?” I smell a troll. At any rate, in the 1980s, the Reagan cuts MORE than paid for themselves. Revenue went up 40% (see my book, “American Entrepreneur”). But spending increased by 100%. If we just held spending constant in 1984 terms, the tax cuts not only would have paid for themselves but SOME additional spending as well. I think your sense of smell is right on.

I recently first ran across one of KSEN's article posts and I thought I smelled the hint of Troll when I read it and his comment posts.

I still smell it on every one of his posted articles since then, including this one.

His method is to post his article, agree with the article's author that "them rich guys are ripping off us poor folks" (communism 101), for a few posts, then when caught, either fade out, or give a few "I sort of agree with you, all I meant was ...." type of responses, then fade out. Only to return later to try again by posting another lefty article.

He/she is relying on his signup date for cover, but in the early days of FR, many, many leftists were signed on, and the Forum allowed many leftists to spew their socialist/communist propaganda, as part of the "discussion".

Jim finally clearly, and rightfully, stated that FR was not a place for lefties to spew, and as many lefties as were found were spanked, and sent back to DU.

Others simply went into Mole Troll mode, popping up periodically like KSEN does.

Reading through this thread, it appears that more and more FReepers are recognizing KSEN's stripes, and I suspect that it won't be long before he gets the ZOT.

87 posted on 12/04/2012 1:43:01 PM PST by Col Freeper (FR: A smorgasbord of Conservative Mindfood - dig in and enjoy it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper; ksen
Looking at Ksen's posts here, it's hard to disagree with you.

He sounds very much like a liberal troll. He seems to be most interested in pushing higher taxes, more regulation, and economic servitude.

88 posted on 12/04/2012 1:48:32 PM PST by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper; LS; ksen

Anyone who wants to claim that supply side economics has failed doesn’t understand that government interventionism is the poison of economics.
And government HAS intervened, horribly and with malice aforthought.
We currently have the most anti-business administration EVER.
And higher taxes DO NOT equal higher growth.
LOWER taxes DO equal higher growth.
That HAS been proven, repeatedly.

Anyone who says otherwise IS trolling.


89 posted on 12/04/2012 1:56:52 PM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; Col Freeper; ksen

Is that the “Jaws” them I am hearing in the background?

Yes, I’d like to hear ksen tell us with a straight face how taxes grow the economy by taking money OUT of it.


90 posted on 12/04/2012 1:59:14 PM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; Col Freeper; ksen

“Theme”

Man, my typos are becoming weapons grade.


91 posted on 12/04/2012 2:01:21 PM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper

Hahaha Col, like I’ve been hiding what I believe. Jim can ban me if he wants, it’s his site. It’s no skin off my nose.


92 posted on 12/04/2012 2:03:17 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; ksen
I don't think ksen will face you directly, but we'll see.

I doubt he can keep up a dialogue on this without admitting he's a full blown lib. Most of his posts on this thread are simple declarations, very leftist in nature, very wrong, and unsupportable in every way unless you're a leftist.

93 posted on 12/04/2012 2:05:32 PM PST by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

((((Darksheare))))


94 posted on 12/04/2012 2:06:34 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
And higher taxes DO NOT equal higher growth.

I've been quite clear that higher tax rates doesn't mean higher growth. In fact I've said a number of times that there is no statistically significant link between GDP growth and marginal tax rates.

LOWER taxes DO equal higher growth.

The data disagrees with you.


95 posted on 12/04/2012 2:12:26 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
I doubt he can keep up a dialogue on this without admitting he's a full blown lib.

What's to admit? I've clearly stated that I'm a liberal/progressive since I started posting here again.

96 posted on 12/04/2012 2:14:59 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Most of his posts on this thread are simple declarations, very leftist in nature, very wrong, and unsupportable in every way unless you're a leftist.

I also use lots of colorful charts. ;)

97 posted on 12/04/2012 2:15:59 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Sorry that I seem to be jumping around instead of commenting on posts chronologically.

Yes, I’d like to hear ksen tell us with a straight face how taxes grow the economy by taking money OUT of it.

I've never claimed that taxes grow the economy. I've claimed that higher marginal rates have not been shown to hurt the economy.

Personally I think what people want is a steady tax rate whatever the rate. Tax uncertainty probably causes a lot more damage than whatever the rate is set at.

Oh, but I have claimed that lower tax rates leads to concentrations of capital and wealth, which I believe the data also bears out.

98 posted on 12/04/2012 2:19:16 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ksen
I guess that means I'm a good judge of character......I caught that from the first post I read.

Too bad. For you. Brain dead is no way to live your life. I suppose you think our economic problem is not taxing the rich enough rather than spending our children's and grandchildren's money on nonsense that does no good for anyone.......

:-)

99 posted on 12/04/2012 2:20:41 PM PST by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
I don't think ksen will face you directly, but we'll see.

You're going to end up loving having me around. Just watch. :D

100 posted on 12/04/2012 2:23:23 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson