Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Friendly flushing: Water-efficient toilets help make sustainable homes
Northwestern.edu ^ | DEC 06, 2012 | MELODY CHANDLERAND, WILL GRUNEWALD

Posted on 12/06/2012 7:20:37 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: ExxonPatrolUs

ALL water is recycled. It gets taken from the environment, used, returned to the environment, evaporated, and returned as rain. It’s been doing this for billions of years. No amount of toilet conservation will ever change this. It is the ultimate in “sustainability”. These people are absolutely nuts.


21 posted on 12/06/2012 7:51:53 PM PST by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“After a visit to the dry toilet, users cover their wastes with a new layer of carbon- rich material. Once the bucket is full, the contents can be dumped out and composted.”

Hopefully they can recycle their OCD meds properly by growing their own “organic” zucchini.


22 posted on 12/06/2012 7:53:20 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
I have the original 1930s toilet here in the house. I could flush a small government functionary down it in one flush. When I mash the handle, the house shakes, and conversations can't be heard.

It's ugly as heck, and hard to keep clean and working. I make parts to keep it working.

I'll die before I give it up.

/johnny

23 posted on 12/06/2012 7:53:20 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat
San Diego is a DESERT ~ they have a severe fresh water shortage and have to pump it in from hundreds of miles away.

True enough you can run a sewer system with just salt water, but you need special equipment to handle it ~

24 posted on 12/06/2012 7:53:33 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

“cover their wastes with a new layer of carbon- rich material. Once the bucket is full, the contents can be dumped out and composted.”

This is ridiculous. All this is is re-hashing the old days.

Which proves beyond doubt all these EnviroNAZIs want is to punt us back to the stone age. Or Moslem society, whichever.


25 posted on 12/06/2012 7:53:46 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

"BAAAAA-WOOOOOSH.....now that's a MAN'S flush, Bud."

26 posted on 12/06/2012 7:57:38 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
Humans had to design and improve sanitary systems for 6000 years to achieve a decent level of sanitary safety by transporting sewage safely to locations where trained professionals could properly treat that sewage for public health.

Now we will require every resident to treat his own sewage in his back yard (or front yard if he doesn't have a back yard), without using water.

What could possibly go wrong?

27 posted on 12/06/2012 8:02:18 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Theoretically they save water. Realistically I have to flush mine sometimes as many as four times to get just one square of toilet paper to go down the drain.


28 posted on 12/06/2012 8:03:26 PM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

I was speaking of the low flow variety. Forgot to mention that. I wouldn’t even think of using a no flow dry one.


29 posted on 12/06/2012 8:05:16 PM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Toilets from before 1980 can use up to 7 gallons of water per flush, but federal regulations require that new toilets use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush. Simply by replacing old toilets, people can dramatically reduce their water consumption”

Barbra Streisand. Swaying the fools out there saying “7 gal” which is OLD toilets. My parents have 3-gal toilets, and lo and behold to this day 40 years later they STILL flush even gigantic loads of (x) and toilet paper in 1 flush.

Meanwhile we have to constantly have our plunger at the ready for all 4 of our “eco” toilets (3 brands, 2 types). Even when we don’t use that we need to flush almost always 2x for just a bit of TP.

That’s 3 gal vs. 3.2 gal per “visit”.


30 posted on 12/06/2012 8:06:58 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel
Which proves beyond doubt all these EnviroNAZIs want is to punt us back to the stone age. Or Moslem society, whichever.

Looks that way. They won't be happy until everyone else is living in the 7th century. I suspect that this is an aspect of outcome-based education... that these folks are convinced that it's a zero-sum world. Therefore, in order for these elitists to live in their accustomed and deserved luxury (because they care), the rest of the planet must squat over a hole and wipe with leaves and rocks.

31 posted on 12/06/2012 8:06:58 PM PST by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

How absolutely fitting that something churned out by Medill would pertain to the crapper.


32 posted on 12/06/2012 8:09:35 PM PST by PacesPaines (NU Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: al_c

The irony is that trains and planes have “no-water” toilets which are VERY powerful. However, I don’t know just how much “energy” we “waste” making that work OK. Kind of like the damnable asshats who say all we need to do for our lo-flows of 1.6 is get an electric assist!

You can’t have it both ways.


33 posted on 12/06/2012 8:11:25 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
When I mash the handle, the house shakes, and conversations can't be heard.

And I will flush down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy My brothers.
34 posted on 12/06/2012 8:13:01 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Screw them!!!

I still use 30 year old toilets that work with the first flush, no matter what!!!


35 posted on 12/06/2012 8:13:30 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
If we’re going to compost human waste, it would be far better for the city to collect the sludge and do it, rather than expect every single individual to do it.

Exactly. And rather than having dump trucks collecting the solid waste from every building, why not use the existing sewer system.
It uses water for transportation, a resource that can be recycled indefinitely.
I bet a sewer system is more energy efficient and less polluting than thousands of sewer dump trucks.

Leftist and environmentalists just don't care how much their solution COSTS, in money, resources and unintended consequences.

36 posted on 12/06/2012 8:14:07 PM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
“Water-efficent terlets help make smellier homes that attract more flies and other vermin” . . .

Where can you find a high-tank terlet with a loud flush anymore?
37 posted on 12/06/2012 8:15:39 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
Dry toilets probably aren’t for everybody. “The ‘yuk’ factor is definitely there,” but that reaction is largely a cultural bias, Pabich said.

What sort of culture is this woman espousing?

I rather like the culture that gave me a flush toilet and reliable potable water.

This woman wants "dry toilets" for everybody and expects that all users will assiduously compost their waste in such a way that all microbes will be destroyed. Not a chance. People can't even be expected to stay off the phone or keep from reading a term paper when driving (yeah, I saw this on my way home this evening!) so how can they be expected to take care of their own waste in such a way that it doesn't jeopardize local health? People can't see beyond the backlit screen of the smartphone in front of their noses, you think they care about an amoebic menace lurking in local topsoil courtesy of the human body?

There was a nice paper published about 20 years ago about SF Bay Area groundwater. Think about how groundwater is a real resource. Don't jeopardize it.

38 posted on 12/06/2012 8:16:56 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Just dig a hole for an outhouse in the back yard!
when full move it over to a new hole a few feet away! No water involved.

I started life using one of those and was afraid I would fall in the big hole. My uncle got bit on his thingydo by a spider in one.


39 posted on 12/06/2012 8:18:48 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (The parasites now outnumber the producers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I was channelling more my mom's side of the family, but yeah, dad's side of the family with the fire and brimstone preachers is valid.

I was rather Texas with that... wasn't I?

/johnny

40 posted on 12/06/2012 8:20:38 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson