Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Owner of plane carrying Jenni Rivera linked to troubled businessman
CNN ^ | 10:35 AM EST, Wed December 12, 2012 | Mariano Castillo and Rafael Romo,

Posted on 12/12/2012 12:14:40 PM PST by BenLurkin

Two civil lawsuits against the company that owns the private jet that crashed Sunday in northern Mexico -- presumably killing music star Jenni Rivera -- accuse the firm of lying about its links to a businessman convicted of falsifying maintenance records.

Insurance firms QBE and Commerce & Industry Insurance Company filed suits this year seeking to rescind its contracts with aviation company Starwood Management because of alleged falsehoods.

In short, the insurance companies claim that Starwood lied in its application for coverage about the history of the planes being insured and about the true owner of the company.

Starwood is the owner of the Learjet that crashed Sunday in Mexico, most likely killing Rivera, who has not been found. DNA tests are currently being conducted to confirm the identities of the remains found at the crash site.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: conspiracytheory; jennirivera

1 posted on 12/12/2012 12:14:43 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Insurance job?


2 posted on 12/12/2012 12:54:02 PM PST by ILS21R (Everything... IS... a conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
>>Starwood is the owner of the Learjet that crashed Sunday in Mexico, most likely killing Rivera, who has not been found. DNA tests are currently being conducted to confirm the identities of the remains found at the crash site.

IOW, the remains were pureed. Ugh. That happens at crashes at near sonic speeds.

Regarding bad records, that has been par for the course at many marginal aviation enterprises.

3 posted on 12/12/2012 1:24:18 PM PST by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Pureed and incinerated:
4 posted on 12/12/2012 1:30:04 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Notice how the wings are bent forward from the force of the impact. Amazing that it is recognizable at all as an aircraft.


5 posted on 12/12/2012 1:31:56 PM PST by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That looks like they spun in. Or a flat spin. No way that thing hit a 600 mph.


6 posted on 12/12/2012 1:34:21 PM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

at 600 mph


7 posted on 12/12/2012 1:34:54 PM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pabianice; Interesting Times; zot
I'm not an expert, but it looks strange to me - as if it were blown in place as opposed to flying across the sky at 450 knots and then crashing scattering debris for a mile or more. No tracks, debris running into the crash site and no extended line of burn because of fuel oil being scattered during a crash.

In a more vertical crash, nose down for example, tends to leave more of a crater with aircraft parts buried in or near the crater.

What say you?

TS

8 posted on 12/12/2012 1:50:01 PM PST by The Shrew (www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew

Let’s get Telly Sevalis on the case.


9 posted on 12/12/2012 2:11:21 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew; Interesting Times

Looks like he crashed in a flat spin. See how the tail is broken off to one side. This wasn’t a vertical crash, or at 450 knots.


10 posted on 12/12/2012 7:46:13 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zot
Thanks for looking at that and educating me.

Regards,

TS

11 posted on 12/12/2012 8:41:21 PM PST by The Shrew (www.wintersoldier.com; www.tstrs.com; The Truth Shall Set You Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Shrew; zot

Looking at the shrubbery behind the tail and the soil disturbance behind the fuselage and right wing it appears the plane bounced over the shrubs in line with the fuselage, then the tail hit the ground first, the nose second, then it settled down and center fuel tank ignited. Notice that the ailerons are still attached. They would have been detached if it spun into the ground.


12 posted on 12/12/2012 10:24:18 PM PST by B4Ranch (Stand Up and Be Counted ... Or Line Up and Be Numbered ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson