You are the one claiming the article is bogus. I ask for your proof and you come back with only angry rhetoric. The burden of proof is on you.
I proved the article with his statement I would say that in any logic and civil argument that it is up to you to If you agree with this ludicrous statement, please feel free to post any and all technical papers and intelligence reports that would tend to back up your claim that his statement is nonsensical and overblown. As far as you being happy to share any technical data that I believe will refute such. Why would you not have are ready supplied such to establish your claim? Or is it your habit to call someone a liar without proof?
It’s m y habit to call bullshit when a claim is made with no facts to back it up, and the garbage you posted fits that profile.