Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity - If the tax bill is not signed by Midnight tonight, will it be "pocket vetoed"?

Posted on 01/02/2013 8:10:07 AM PST by Perdogg

If the tax bill is not signed by Midnight tonight, will it be "pocket vetoed"? The old Congress expires in 13 hours, right?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/02/2013 8:10:10 AM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Not to Worry! 0bama may be in Hawaii, but the 0bama autopen is still in the Whitehouse. ;-)


2 posted on 01/02/2013 8:16:54 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I'm quite sure our president will sign it, even if it is the ol' "electronic signature" thingee.

Heaven forbid he sticks around to actually do something he has to do....

3 posted on 01/02/2013 8:19:15 AM PST by China Clipper ( Animals? Sure I like animals. See? There they are, right next to the potatoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Let's say Obama signs it tomorrow. Who would challenge the legitimacy of the law on the technicality? The cowardly and pathetic Congress would shrug like they did when he blatantly ignored the War Powers Act in Libya. The Surpeme Court under Roberts would just say "elections have consequences" and ignore it. Obama answers to nobody at this point, it seems.

Honestly, if the house hasn't been willing to say "if the Senate won't execute its constitutional responsibility to pass a budget, we won't authorize funds to run the government" for four years now, when do you think they will ever grow a spine?

4 posted on 01/02/2013 8:20:40 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Lame duck Congresses and lame duck presidents have still managed to do damage.


5 posted on 01/02/2013 8:28:37 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

>Who would challenge the legitimacy of the law on the technicality?

Someone who would have to pay higher taxes.


6 posted on 01/02/2013 8:29:31 AM PST by Perdogg (Mark Levin - It's called the Bill of Rights not Bill of Needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

That’s not how a pocket veto works. A bill is only “pocket vetoed” if it is not signed within ten days of being passed by Congress AND Congress is not in session after the tenth day. Simply failing to sign legislation before Congress adjourns does not mean that the legislation is “pocket vetoed.”


7 posted on 01/02/2013 10:37:41 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson