Skip to comments.
US Temperatures Have Been Falsely Adjusted According to the Level of Carbon Dioxide ....
 theendofthemystery.blogspot.com ^
 | Friday, October 5, 2012
 | Harry Dale Huffman
Posted on 01/20/2013 11:19:21 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
 
  
  
 
  
 US Temperatures Have Been Falsely Adjusted According to the Level of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere 
 
 
  
   Steven Goddard in recent months has been presenting evidence on his 
real-science site of fraudulent manipulation, by NASA and other renowned federal scientific institutions, of the temperature data used by climate scientists to promulgate global warming hysteria. Goddard has presented the following graph, showing that adjustments made to the US temperature records have systematically lowered past temperatures and raised more recent ones, to give a false indication of warming over the past century and more: 
   
  The indicated adjustments looked familiar to me, as being like the actual change in atmospheric carbon dioxide, as measured at Mauna Loa since 1957: 
   
  I submitted a comment, suggesting that a graph comparing the temperature adjustments with the measured change in carbon dioxide "would be nice", but I then decided to do it quickly myself, working from the above graphs: 
   
  The correlation between the temperature adjustments (which should, it must be emphasized, have nothing to do with the atmospheric carbon dioxide) and the carbon dioxide level is extremely good; the correlation coefficient (R-square value) for the best-fit line above is 0.974. This means virtually all (97%) of the change in the US temperature adjustments, from 1960 through 2010, is due to the measured change in carbon dioxide. The US temperatures have quite apparently been deliberately changed according to the level of carbon dioxide, and can therefore not be used to even suggest, much less prove, that the US has warmed due to increasing carbon dioxide. 
I consider this the smoking gun that those adjustments made to the US temperature record are indeed fraudulent. This -- along with Steven Goddard's recent efforts to uncover such fraud -- should be made front-page news, worldwide. (Of course, I have already, 2 years ago, showed that there is no greenhouse effect, of increasing temperature with increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide -- and that too should have already become worldwide news.) 
   
  
  Harry Dale Huffman     at 12:49 PM            
   
 
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: agw; agwfraud; climatechange; corruption; democrats; envirofascism; fraud; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenfraud; thegreenlie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-27 next  last
    
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    The warmies faking data! Tell me it isn’t so...
Do I really need the /s?
 
2
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:26:07 AM PST
by 
El Laton Caliente
(NRA Life Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    Our phony “scientists” today merit far less respect than the shamans of ancient days. At least the shamans were not robbing their fellow man by greedily soaking up dwindling tax dollars with their corrupt “research” tailored to fit the big government agenda of the Marxists in politics and academia.
Were I a parent of a NASA or NOA scientist, I would say my child plays piano in a whore house.
 
3
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:26:51 AM PST
by 
txrefugee
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    There is no such thing as global warming science. There are only trend models using falsified data.
Every solution to the “problem” of global warming involves taking money from the taxpayers of the United States(and other “wealthy” countries) and giving it to left wing elitists, totalitarians and criminals.
 
4
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:34:19 AM PST
by 
detective
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    Of course you must adjust the data to match the model, otherwise, the model isn’t worth dog s**t.
 
5
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:36:02 AM PST
by 
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
 
To: El Laton Caliente; txrefugee; detective
6
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:38:17 AM PST
by 
Ernest_at_the_Beach
((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
 
To: reg45
    Right....and all supercomputers should be used for this valuable exercise of modeling this climate change.....
What a waste.....
7
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:41:59 AM PST
by 
Ernest_at_the_Beach
((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
 
To: SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Fred Nerks; Carry_Okie; blam; Lorianne; Twotone; bigbob; NormsRevenge; ...
    fyi
 :::::Off to the NFL Playoffs.
8
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:50:00 AM PST
by 
Ernest_at_the_Beach
((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    The really silly think is that climate/weather has been known to be impossible to predict since 1963- when Edward Lorenz wrote his paper “Deterministic Aperiodic Flow” that explained that nonlinearities cause chaos, and thus make long term prediction impossible.
You can plot historical trends. They have NO ability to predict. As an alternative to statist global warming policy, we should promote greater freedom, leading to greater wealth, so that when weather changes, or climate changes, we have the greatest ability to adapt to change.
Stored food, a variety of clothes, and transportation options make sense for a ‘reaction to reality’ policy.
 
9
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:50:00 AM PST
by 
donmeaker
(Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    Another proof of AGFA, Anthropogenic Global False Alarming.
 
10
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:52:21 AM PST
by 
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil.)
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    This article is from October last year?
 
11
posted on 
01/20/2013 11:54:38 AM PST
by 
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil.)
 
To: Rocky
12
posted on 
01/20/2013 12:03:44 PM PST
by 
Ernest_at_the_Beach
((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    Cool.
Also isn’t a living planet going to have changing temps? Wouldn’t it be freakier if it always stayed the same ?
 
13
posted on 
01/20/2013 12:05:22 PM PST
by 
Yaelle
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
To: reg45
    Lol.
 Reminds me of my Physics lab in College.
16
posted on 
01/20/2013 12:49:36 PM PST
by 
dhs12345
 
To: donmeaker
    Exactly. It is a very very complicated system.
 The Butterfly Effect.
 Measurement errors and modeling errors get amplified over time to the point that predictions are impossible.
 Even if the measurements are near perfect and the models nearly exact, there are still errors.
 This is the biggest lie of all. The "know all" gods in scientific academia are being dishonest.
17
posted on 
01/20/2013 1:00:02 PM PST
by 
dhs12345
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    I wonderin if this is connected.
For years I’ve gotten my weather info from the National Weather Service site, they were more accurate than other weather sites I’d found, plus no ads and stupid graphics.
Then a couple of months or so ago (?), they changed the NWS site and made it somewhat stupider looking, and now I notice the predictions of temps are way, way off. Up to 10 to 15 degrees warmer than what my thermometer on the porch says.
Odd.
 
18
posted on 
01/20/2013 1:02:59 PM PST
by 
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    Licensed crooks abound within our government agencies.
 
19
posted on 
01/20/2013 2:09:33 PM PST
by 
Marine_Uncle
(I'm going John Galt.... But.  Honor must be earned.)
 
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
    AlGore- Sure it was all lies, but it lasted long enough for me (Grinning smugly).
 
20
posted on 
01/20/2013 2:16:17 PM PST
by 
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-27 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson