Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Oztrich Boy; Eaker

“1. It’s not just pet cats. More native birds are eaten by feral cats. Banning law-abiding cats won’t affect illegal cats.”

States have banned the ownership of legally obtained and maintained reptiles because of a problem in one isolated area, even though the snakes pose *absolutely no danger* in those states.

See how this works?

How many people freaking out over this were all for banning snake species/pit bulls/’scary dog breeds’?

If you don’t defend the rights of other people’s pet choices, don’t cry when they come after your preferred pet.


39 posted on 01/22/2013 11:15:37 AM PST by Salamander (Put some workboots in the drier. Recite Dr Seuss. Now you're a rapper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Salamander

Some PETA nuts a couple years back “raided” a reptile shop south of me.
They then dumped the “liberated” reptiles off in the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation area.
So for awhile you stood a good chance of finding an iguana, a swift, or a python lazing it out on various vegetation.
Until the first real freeze.

What hits the news isntead?
PETA nuts disrobing for their propaganda.
*sheesh*


41 posted on 01/22/2013 11:28:53 AM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Salamander

Denver banned pit bulls....and dog attacks increased.


75 posted on 01/22/2013 2:09:00 PM PST by CatherineofAragon (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson