Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did a baker break the law when he denied service to same-sex couple?
KATU ^ | Erica Nochlin

Posted on 02/04/2013 4:06:12 PM PST by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Morgana

None of the stories about this bake shop ever name the women who complained. It amounts to an anonymous lynching by these women. My bet is that if one had the names of the women one would find they are operatives.


21 posted on 02/04/2013 5:15:34 PM PST by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The baker should have just agreed and made them a really atrocious, hidious, nasty cake and said sorry, I don’t understand what could have possibly happened.

Ya’ll come back now, hear?


22 posted on 02/04/2013 5:31:38 PM PST by slouper (Love it or leave it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I would bet this woman CHOSE to pick this baker BECAUSE she wanted to force him to have to accommodate her just to prove she could.


23 posted on 02/04/2013 5:35:06 PM PST by Wisconsinlady (The 2nd amendment is NOT about hunting-but protection from a tyrannical govt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What ever happened to this sign?

WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE!


24 posted on 02/04/2013 5:37:08 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
This law violates the first amendment. He should take them all the way to the Supreme Court.

No, it does not violate the first amendment; it is a state law and the first amendment lays restriction upon Congress, not the State's legislature. Therein is the hidden evil of 'incorporation', it applies some magic to make the Constitution say what it does not -- amending it without amendment.

It is, however, an invalid law:

OR Constitution
Article I - Section 3. Freedom of religious opinion.

No law shall in any case whatever control the free exercise, and enjoyment of religeous [sic] opinions, or interfere with the rights of conscience.

25 posted on 02/04/2013 5:44:01 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone....


26 posted on 02/04/2013 5:50:46 PM PST by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The baker should have defrosted a Sara Lee frozen cake and stuck two cucumbers in it and said here’s your cake that will be $300.00.


27 posted on 02/04/2013 5:56:53 PM PST by TonyM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; Youaskedforit; KirbDog; Teófilo; mojo114; malkee; missingwv; HalfIrish; Dr. Morrall; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

28 posted on 02/04/2013 5:57:02 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; Youaskedforit; KirbDog; Teófilo; mojo114; malkee; missingwv; HalfIrish; Dr. Morrall; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

29 posted on 02/04/2013 5:57:38 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
"Elections matter."

Sure, but at least we don't have a Mormon President. /sarc

30 posted on 02/04/2013 6:11:40 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
They seek out and try to destroy anyone who stands in their way.

This is not...nor has it EVER been...about marriage.

This is about putting the legal stamp of approval on the disordered behavior of homosexuality through threats of lawsuits,fines,or loss of employment....destroying any and all that remind them they're not normal!

31 posted on 02/04/2013 6:41:15 PM PST by massmike (At least no one is wearing a "Ron Paul - 2016" tee shirt........yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder

IIRC, Goldwater predicted this.


32 posted on 02/04/2013 6:44:41 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Like I’ve been saying, law that supports “homosexual marriage” is designed to persecute those that refuse to service homosexual behavior.

The govt doesn’t belong in the marriage business.


33 posted on 02/04/2013 7:06:50 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Whatever happened to freedom of association? Did that get canceled?


34 posted on 02/04/2013 7:14:54 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Bakeries are covered as public accomodations under USC Title 42. As such, service cannot be refused based on race, color, religion, or national origin. I don’t know if this has been amended to include sexual orientation.

Still, even if the law has not been amended, refusal of service to gays is probably actionable - and it would be up to the courts to decide.

I suppose that a bakery could still refuse service and not lose in court - by stating that it no longer will provide ANY wedding cakes to ANYONE, regardless of sexual orientation. But, it could still find itself in court, as above. Not to mention it would be cutting off its nose to spite its face [profit-wise] by doing so ...


35 posted on 02/04/2013 7:49:14 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Oregon passed a hard-fought battle for a marriage amendment to their constitution. So, the immoral barbarians do end-runs to get at people of moral conscience in other ways, like “anti-discrimination” laws.


36 posted on 02/05/2013 7:10:35 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
Like I’ve been saying, law that supports “homosexual marriage” is designed to persecute those that refuse to service homosexual behavior.

The govt doesn’t belong in the marriage business.

Um..., even if the government were not "in the marriage business" the supposed anti-discrimination law would still be pressed by these sodomites. This has nothing to do with "marriage." Besides, Oregon already defines marriage as a man/woman institution in their Constitution, so these dykes are living in la-la land.

I have a better idea. Let's work to rescind the Civil Rights Act and have it declared unconstitutional. THAT is what is being used to strip us of our freedoms.

37 posted on 02/05/2013 7:16:22 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Oregon prohibits same sex marriage by statute. How is the baker wrong?


38 posted on 02/05/2013 12:07:20 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The practical solution is to mess up the order without saying anything directly.

Better still, change the government. This one is no good.


39 posted on 02/05/2013 5:53:13 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson