Thanks to GopherBroke for da ping!
Yes
76%
No
20%
Not sure
4%
Yes
77%
No
19%
Not sure
4%
Of course, everyone benefits. The criminals do not know whose house is armed or unarmed and increased risk reduces crime as with any other activity.
Of course, everyone benefits. The criminals do not know whose house is armed or unarmed and increased risk reduces crime as with any other activity.
FReeped. Up to 79% yes
Media and government employees should not be private either
I would vote no in a sane world. That way the crime wave would break on a liberal shore.
Perhaps, then, it is inadvisable to obtain any sort of registration, certification, etc., in order to protect one’s privacy. We’ve all seen how badly the powers-that-be become unstrung with a challenge. Let’s reconsider this. (Not that I have any raisin-d-ate to be concerned.)
“All “news” media people should have their names and addresses public.”
I agree with that statement completely. I also believe that no one should apply for a carry permit. The second amendment is your carry permit. Permits are nothing but back door registration.
Well effin’ duh! That’s why it is called concealed carry. If we wanted everyone to know we had a firearm, we’d open carry...
If the person did,nt want to keep it private why would they keep it concealed in the first place, yes.