Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court won't block Chicago woman's deportation
LA Times ^ | February 20, 2013, 12:29 | DAVID G. SAVAGE

Posted on 02/21/2013 6:47:51 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court refused Wednesday to block the deportation of a Chicago woman and thousands of other immigrants who pleaded guilty in the past to serious crimes and were not warned by their lawyers that a criminal record targeted them for removal.

The decision highlights the stark consequences for noncitizens of having a criminal record. The current law calls for mandatory deportation for immigrants, including lawful residents, who have an “aggravated felony” on their record. The term can describe a variety of state and federal offenses.

Immigration lawyers say tens of thousands of immigrants, many of them lawful permanent residents, plead guilty each year to crimes that may lead to them being deported.

Three years ago, the high court ruled that lawyers had a duty to warn noncitizens of the prospect that a guilty plea would lead to their deportation.

But in a 7-2 ruling Wednesday, the justices said their earlier decision cannot be applied retroactively to extend relief to immigrants who pleaded guilty to serious offenses before 2010.

Wednesday's decision came in the case of Roselva Chaidez, a Chicago woman who was born in Mexico. She has lived in Chicago for decades and had been a lawful permanent resident since 1977. Her lawyers said she has three children and two grandchildren.

In 1998, she admitted to receiving $1,200 from an insurance company for having falsely claimed to have been injured in an auto accident. The scheme, run by her son and others, netted $26,000, the government said.

(Excerpt) Read more at touch.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: aliens

1 posted on 02/21/2013 6:47:57 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

I am a citizen and somehow managed to go 40 years without getting an aggrivated felony. Is it too much to ask them to behave and not commit crimes at least?


2 posted on 02/21/2013 6:51:12 PM PST by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
Makes sense. If the lawyer screwed up in advising them not to lie and hide their records (a breach of ethics in itself), they should sue the lawyer. The US public shouldn't give them a free pass to the front of the immigration line.

In my own life, if my lawyer screws up, no one else except possibly him is going to make good.

3 posted on 02/21/2013 6:52:54 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

4 posted on 02/21/2013 6:55:46 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Speaking of the right to have a competent lawyer, at least four of the justices are not competent lawyers, so what about WE THE PEOPLE ~ don’t we have a right to have competent lawyers on the bench?


5 posted on 02/21/2013 6:58:23 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Any little deportation helps. Bye Bye!


6 posted on 02/21/2013 7:17:31 PM PST by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

It’s about time! Now who is going to find these thousands like her, and how do we force them to leave? It’s not like ICE will do it.

As for the decision by SCOTUS what immigrant (legal or illegal) doesn’t know committing crimes will get you deported - especially a FELONY!? Heck, that’s like basic knowledge isn’t it? Besides, whatever happened to ignorance of the law not being an excuse?


7 posted on 02/21/2013 7:28:39 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Hasta la vista!


8 posted on 02/21/2013 7:32:26 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs


9 posted on 02/21/2013 7:35:40 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Chicago?

That’s where people should be Deported TO, not from.

Sing it Frank!

My kind of Town,
Obamaville is,
My Kind of Town...


10 posted on 02/21/2013 8:03:30 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (When the Sheep elect a Wolf to lead them, it's time for the Sheepdogs to move to Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Is the son getting booted, too? Or did he have the good fortune to be born here?


11 posted on 02/21/2013 8:06:01 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
In 1998, she admitted to receiving $1,200 from an insurance company for having falsely claimed to have been injured in an auto accident. The scheme, run by her son and others, netted $26,000, the government said.

Good riddance to this stinking scumbag.

12 posted on 02/21/2013 8:08:18 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

My bet is that she other crimes as well


13 posted on 02/22/2013 10:17:16 AM PST by Tspud1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson