Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Guilty of Killing Businessman Who Laughed at Him When Pastrami Fell Out of His Sandwich
Torrance Daily Breeze ^ | 02/12/2013 | Larry Altman

Posted on 03/08/2013 12:36:56 PM PST by nickcarraway

A Gardena man was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter Monday for killing a businessman who laughed at him when the pastrami fell out of his sandwich at a Western Avenue doughnut shop.

Ronald Eugene Murray II, 26, appeared to sigh in relief as a Torrance jury first found him not guilty of second-degree murder, choosing the lesser offense of voluntary manslaughter.

"The defendant got a fair trial and we got a fair verdict," Deputy District Attorney Jennifer Turk said. "I think justice is served."

Murray could have faced 15 years to life in prison if convicted of the murder charge, but will now be sentenced to a maximum of 11 years in prison at a March 4 appearance at the Torrance courthouse.

Turk said Murray punched and kicked 56-year-old New Jersey resident Mun Jang so hard on Oct. 1, 2011, that Jang died in a hospital two days later. A kick to the head proved to be the fatal blow.

Neither man knew each other, but Murray and Jang had patronized Donut King, at 15032 S. Western Ave., at 3:30 that morning. Jang, who was visiting Los Angeles on business, went for an ice cream. Murray purchased a pastrami sandwich and was particular with his order, asking for tomatoes, lettuce and mayonnaise, but no onions or jalapenos.

Jang, who was with a friend, watched as Murray took a bite. Some of the meat fell out, Turk said.

"The real focus of his anger were the people who would not give him a sandwich," Turk said. "The only person he could take his rage out on was the victim."

Prosecutors said Murray sucker-punched Jang and then punched him repeatedly, inflicting the fatal blow with a kick to the head while Jang was on the ground. He then threw the sandwich so hard into Jang's head that mayonnaise and lettuce stuck in his ear.

Some of the crime was caught on video.

Testifying on his own behalf, Murray said he wasn't trying to hurt Jang. He said he acted in self-defense after he slipped on the sandwich meat and fell to the ground. Jang, Murray testified, stood over him with a fist, so he protected himself by fighting back, Turk said.

Jurors did not believe the self-defense argument, but decided he did not commit murder. He took the beating too far, kicking a defenseless man in the head, Turk said.

"Somebody lost his life because he laughed and had a normal human reaction to something that was pretty funny," Turk said. "It could have been anybody standing there."

Deputy Public Defender Haaris Syed, who represented Murray, was not available for comment.


TOPICS: Food; Local News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: nickcarraway

21 posted on 03/08/2013 2:15:28 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

For some reason, this reminded me of the stories from the Old West of John Wesley Hardin shooting a man for snoring too loud and for looking at him funny.


22 posted on 03/08/2013 2:20:52 PM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

11 YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Words fail me. Sometimes these people who serve on a jury really suck at it.


23 posted on 03/08/2013 2:40:21 PM PST by diamond6 (Need scientific proof of God? Check out: http://www.magisreasonfaith.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

“Words fail me! 11 years for murder??/ and the Prosecutor is happy with that?”

I knew someone that got out on parole after seven years for stabbing someone in the heart. He stabbed the person in a fast food joint, dropped the knife on the floor, turned to his girlfriend and said “let’s go bowling”. His relatives couldn’t understand why I never visited him in prison.


24 posted on 03/08/2013 3:11:38 PM PST by dljordan (Voltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The Death Penalty would be appropriate in this case if you ask me.

But that’s just my opinion.


25 posted on 03/08/2013 4:20:47 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

“It’s to die for!”


26 posted on 03/08/2013 4:22:09 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

27 posted on 03/08/2013 4:29:40 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson