Posted on 03/17/2013 12:57:29 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
F.Y.I., for Dropbox, phones are not required. If you have or work on more than one computer you can use it. Even on public use computers you can use the Dropbox web page to access your files.
It's even great if you have just one computer. Any important files you put into your Dropbox will be there if something bad happens to your computer. Stolen computer, hard drive failure, accidentally delete something, etc., no problem if it was in your Dropbox. And at no cost. I highly recommend it to everyone. :) It is a very robust cloud storage service.
I tried carbonite (yes I have problems with their politics) and they have a mobile app. It automatically saves photos to your PC, as well as the cloud. Plus it gives you the ability to remote wipe your phone.
Sue them for what. I know they old saying that you can sue anyone for anything, but what would he sue them for? Harassment?
Should have called one of your neighbors, to have them remove the valve stem cores out of the "cops and dyfs" tires, while they were inside your house.That’s dynamite. Sounds too good to be true. I really need to backup my files too.
Check it out here: Cerberus for android.
I would have asked the police for the identity of the Dyfs, saying that you intended to file a complaint against the Dyfs, and it would be essential for any litigation that the identity of their agent be part of the police record as a material witness, also in case criminal charges are eventually filed.
I’m pretty sure the police would have to at least put it in their records, and once in there as “certified” by the police, there is no more “wasn’t me” defense.
“We really need an app which can be used to take a pic and send it to a pre-set destination in one click.”
I’ve been mulling over writing something similar. You’ve got a good variant there, will consider.
“I think I would opt for living in a free state.”
Interesting that you used that nomenclature, “free state”.
Perhaps you’d be interested in this post I just put up today:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2997788/posts?page=6#6
Thanks for that information. I did not know that.
The writer, though, should have gone over his composition and made that clear to people such as myself who are not familiar with Mr. Nappen.
Prepare for the Boot on the Neck,,,,
Just an irritant to me about the writing:
Ok I’m not sure what happened. They were trying to take his guns away or just look at them or what?
one of my son’s threw out of his house a female cop that was out of line....the Chief of police in the small town had her call and apologize.....they are not all idiots, some are honest...and it starts with the chief and filters down to the beat cop....my dad always said if the cops are out of line its their superiors that allow it...he was a cop and had men under him...
I'm talking in the context of 2013, not 1857. The article was about the blatant attempt to violate a family's Constitutional rights by attempting to harass the head of the house to open his safe and provide his firearms to the police for "inspection", even though there was no reasonable cause. Today's New Jersey is a socialist hellhole that violates our Constitution and Bill of Rights on so many levels. New Jersey residents are more subjects than free people.
Hey, I can express my opinion on a document, such as other Freepers often do when they see a poorly-written piece.
And I don’t give a sh@t what you think about it.
bump
“asked me for the dyfs workers name. she wouldnt give it. i asked for credentials and she wouldnt show em. “
On my property they’d be on REAL rocky ground at this point. These aren’t honest officials, these are thugs.
Boogar-digger on bang-switch?
Not in my house!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.