Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh, Tesla: Your 'Lease' Is Smart, But That Calculator Wasn't
greencarreports.com ^ | Apr 3, 2013 | John Voelcker

Posted on 04/03/2013 1:40:03 PM PDT by jjotto

Well, that didn't take long.

Yesterday, just before 5 pm Eastern time, Tesla Motors [NSDQ:TSLA] released details of its new "lease-like" financing product.

The general consensus in the media (we read a lot of Tesla coverage here, folks) has been that it's smart for Tesla to offer financing for its Model S electric luxury sport sedan. It will expand the pool of potential owners.

But the press release, and a subsequent media call with CEO Elon Musk, mentioned a cost calculator on the company's website that purports to let users calculate the true net out-of-pocket cost for a 2013 Tesla Model S under the new financing.

As details of the calculator became visible, however, its assumptions and calculations were widely savaged...

...Our favorite conclusion, tweeted by Automotive News reporter Nick Bunkley: "According to Tesla website, if you live in Calif. and make $2 million/year, driving a Model S has an effective monthly cost of minus-$2,000."

The whole affair leads us to wonder why Tesla continues to push the boundaries of its communications when actual facts so often cast their assertions in a different light...

(Excerpt) Read more at greencarreports.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: lease; tesla
Another chapter in the Obamanomics textbook.
1 posted on 04/03/2013 1:40:03 PM PDT by jjotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jjotto

With government subsidies no matter what they charge they’ll make a profit.


2 posted on 04/03/2013 1:42:26 PM PDT by Terry Mross (This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Government subsidies for an electric toy for millionaires with a guilty conscience.
3 posted on 04/03/2013 1:44:15 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Let’s change tense in the middle of the headline!


4 posted on 04/03/2013 1:56:27 PM PDT by Rio (Tempis Fugit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

if you factor in what the taxpayers paid for each of those cars, its staggering


5 posted on 04/03/2013 1:56:28 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Toyota Corp. was one of the first to get one of the $100,000 gems. I’m tracking a rumor that when the Tesla was reverse engineered, Toyota found that the $100k car probably cost $140k to build!


6 posted on 04/03/2013 2:05:43 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Yep, without government subsidies Tesla would be selling RC cars


7 posted on 04/03/2013 2:10:15 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Toyota Corp. was one of the first to get one of the $100,000 gems. I’m tracking a rumor that when the Tesla was reverse engineered, Toyota found that the $100k car probably cost $140k to build!

I've heard the same thing, although I heard the cost to build was in the $150k to $175k range.

The reported "First profitable quarter ever" by Tesla is smoke and mirrors as well. They pulled some sales forward to the first quarter by announcing that they were discontinuing the S model and orders needed to be placed by 3/31. Of course, the S model is the only reasonably priced vehicle in their line up ($50k up, depending on options). But, some suckers lined up to place the orders. PT Barnum was right!

8 posted on 04/03/2013 3:54:39 PM PDT by RobertClark ("May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Yep, without government subsidies Tesla would be selling RC cars

Or: used tacos from TacoBell.

9 posted on 04/03/2013 4:16:07 PM PDT by dearolddad (/i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dearolddad

“used tacos”

I like it, government boondoggles could be called “Used Tacos”


10 posted on 04/03/2013 5:46:57 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RobertClark

My buddy’s daughter just got one.
Other than the battery pack (12 grand) there’s not that much there.
It’s a sheet metal chassis with an electric motor, nicely turned out at a mid luxury car level.

So the unit cost shouldn’t be all that much.
Now if you factor in the capital investment over a relatively small number of cars, yeah that’s a lot.

Is that what you mean by “cost to build” ?


11 posted on 04/03/2013 5:53:05 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson