Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shark Dads Lose Babies to Unborn Cannibal Siblings
National Geographic ^ | 4/30/2013 | Ed Yong

Posted on 05/01/2013 12:11:38 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Inside its mother’s womb, an unborn sand tiger shark is busy devouring its brothers and sisters. It’s just 10 centimetres long but it already has well-developed eyes and a set of sharp teeth, which it turns against its smaller siblings. By the time the pregnant female gives birth, it only has two babies left—one from each of its two wombs. These survivors have already eaten all the others. They’re the bloody victors of a pre-birth battle.

The arched back, upturned snout and protruding teeth of a sand tiger shark give it a particularly brutish look. Its reproductive habits don’t help. After sex, any fertilised eggs settle in one of the female’s two uteri. Like a quarter of shark species, the sand tiger never lays these eggs. Instead, they hatch inside her once they reach a certain size.

Timing matters. The first embryo to emerge in each uterus—the ‘hatchling’—always cannibalises its younger siblings. It’s so voracious that at least one scientist has been bitten by a sand tiger pup while unwisely sticking a finger in a pregnant female’s uterus.

The cannibal not only nourishes itself on its siblings’ bodies, but also gains sole access to the nutritious supply of unfertilised eggs that its mother provides. On this rich diet of yolk and flesh, the hatchling grows at a tremendous pace. When it is eventually born, it’s already a metre in length—that’s big enough to protect it from many predators. “Only really big sharks eat baby sand tigers,” says Demian Chapman from Stony Brook University in New York.

Chapman studies the mating behaviour of sharks, and was fascinated by what the sand tiger’s bizarre practices mean for males. If a female mates with many males, her litter could initially include pups from many fathers. But it’s entirely possible that the pups of some males are cannibalised by the pups of others, before they’re even born! So if you gave sand tiger pups a paternity test, what would you find?

Chapman studied the bodies of 15 pregnant sand tiger sharks that died near South Africa’s beaches after getting caught in protective nets. (The nets were put up after a series of shark attacks in the 1960s.) He took tissue samples from mothers and embryos, and analysed microsatellites—short, repetitive pieces of DNA that are used in family tests—at 10 places in their genomes.

A sand tiger shark hatchling next to an embryo (the smaller one on the top left). Credit: D.ABERCROMBIE. The results showed that females regularly mate with at least two partners. In cases where the hatchlings hadn’t finished devouring their siblings, the embryos were fathered by two or more different males. And when only the hatchlings remained, they were often half-siblings rather than full ones.

Chapman’s results showed that, yes, some males manage to mate with females but never actually contribute to the next generation of sharks. Their young are devoured in the womb.

This is yet another reminder that sex is just one step towards actual reproduction. In many animals, females exert a surprising amount of choice over who fathers their young. Even after sex, females can store the sperm of different partners in separate compartments and determine which ones get to fertilise her eggs.

For males, this means that sexual competition continues after sex. It’s not just about finding mates, but about ensuring that your sperm fertilises her eggs. This leads to fierce “sperm competitions” and bizarre adaptations, where males scrape away the sperm of past mates, guard or plug females so they can no longer accept partners, “traumatically inseminate” her through her back, or even poison partners with toxic sperm to limit future sexual encounters.

The sand tiger shark’s “embryonic cannibalism” takes these competitions to a whole new level. Even if a male successfully fertilises a female’s eggs, there’s still no guarantee that his offspring will actually be born. This may explain why, in captivity at least, male sand tigers often guard the females they mate with. You’d also expect natural selection to also favour males whose offspring grow particularly quickly, so they become the cannibal hatchlings rather than the devoured runts. This may explain why sand tiger embryos have evolved to have such unusually well-developed eyes and teeth.

Females, meanwhile, may not need to bother with carefully choosing their mates. By having sex with several males, and just letting their offspring duke it out inside her, she ensures that the she gives birth to the offspring of the fittest partners.

Reference: Chapman, Wintner, Abercrombie, Ashe, Bernard, Shivji & Feldheim. 2013 The behavioural and genetic mating system of the sand tiger shark, Carcharias taurus, an intrauterine cannibal. Biol Lett http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0003


TOPICS: Outdoors; Pets/Animals; Science
KEYWORDS: marinebiology; sharks

1 posted on 05/01/2013 12:11:38 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Don’t give the Liberals any more ideas.


2 posted on 05/01/2013 12:13:48 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It’s so voracious that at least one scientist has been bitten by a sand tiger pup while unwisely sticking a finger in a pregnant female’s uterus.

My God. What nasty little creatures.

3 posted on 05/01/2013 12:18:08 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
One reason why epigenetic signals from the father in promiscuous species are so important in evolution.

When you mix a male Lion with a female Tiger you get a huge Liger.

When you mix a male Tiger with a female Lion you get a small Tigon.

4 posted on 05/01/2013 12:19:16 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
don't hyenas also eat their littermates?
5 posted on 05/01/2013 12:23:39 PM PDT by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed " people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The headline read like the poster for a band lineup at an urban punk/metal club.


6 posted on 05/01/2013 12:24:46 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (HRC:"Sometimes she looks like a primary schoolgirl and sometimes a pensioner going shopping,"-NKorea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

If they can bite a man’s finger, what about the privates of one of the mother’s many sexual partners?


7 posted on 05/01/2013 12:26:08 PM PDT by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

“It’s so voracious that at least one scientist has been bitten by a sand tiger pup while unwisely sticking a finger in a pregnant female’s uterus.
My God. What nasty little creatures. “

I know. Scientists can be that way.


8 posted on 05/01/2013 12:28:55 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

“Don’t give the Liberals any more ideas.”

D*mn, beat me to it.


9 posted on 05/01/2013 12:32:47 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In a state of nature life is simple, brutish and short ... oh wait a minute


10 posted on 05/01/2013 12:34:59 PM PDT by frithguild (You can call me Snippy the Anti-Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

If Planned Parenthood hears about this, they will make the sand tiger shark their mascot.


11 posted on 05/01/2013 12:41:45 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

I think the liberals are already killing the unborn....


12 posted on 05/01/2013 12:43:10 PM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

ROTFL.


13 posted on 05/01/2013 12:52:01 PM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I sure am glad this important research wasn’t affected by the “sequester.”


14 posted on 05/01/2013 12:53:39 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In bio lab in College we had to dissect a sand shark. In my class my partner and I opened up our shark and their were 3 babies in there. They were about 5 inches long. I guess the 3rd was not eaten yet!

Of course our shark was a celebrity in that class due to the babies but sadly it was so long ago my memory has faded as to the two wombs!


15 posted on 05/01/2013 12:59:44 PM PDT by alisasny (If you cant afford 10 bucks per month to save your own daughters ovary then vote OBAMA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; All

[Who knew that’s where abortionists got their start...in the womb of mom-sharks?]


16 posted on 05/01/2013 1:00:37 PM PDT by Colofornian (Jude 3: "...I felt compelled to write and urge you to CONTEND for the faith that was once for all")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; All
[Who knew that's where abortionists got their start...in the womb of mom-sharks?]

Must me where the term oft applied to abortionists...BOTTOM-FEEDERS...came from


17 posted on 05/01/2013 1:01:59 PM PDT by Colofornian (Jude 3: "...I felt compelled to write and urge you to CONTEND for the faith that was once for all")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

At least shark babies only have to fight someone their own age and size to be born.


18 posted on 05/01/2013 1:08:50 PM PDT by ansel12 (Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
My God. What nasty little creatures.

Not ALL scientists are that bad. I've met a few nice ones too.

19 posted on 05/01/2013 1:25:41 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson