What really happened to boys?

American Thinker ^ | April 28, 2013 | Bruce Deitrick Price

[TwelveOfTwenty]

Yes really. There are cases where men have won. I know of one who not only beat false abuse charges, but got a restraining order against her. Why? Because instead of caving, they stood up for their rights.

Unfortunately, since most men choose to live their lives in penis dictated servitude not caring about this bias until it affects them directly, cases like this are few and far between.

If the Civil Rights pioneers thought like you, there would have been no Civil Rights Movement.

[papertyger]

Yes really. There are cases where men have won. I know of one who not only beat false abuse charges, but got a restraining order against her. Why? Because instead of caving, they stood up for their rights. Unfortunately, since most men choose to live their lives in penis dictated servitude not caring about this bias until it affects them directly, cases like this are few and far between. If the Civil Rights pioneers thought like you, there would have been no Civil Rights Movement.

You completely miss the "center of gravity" of the issue just as the pro-life movement has. You praise inconsequential "victories" as the great mass of society and culture washes around you, entrenching the thing you oppose as a fait accompli.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

You completely miss the "center of gravity" of the issue

The center of gravity is the penis dictated servitude that most men have chosen to live under.

the great mass of society and culture

That great mass totally excludes men, right? I mean, all of that sperm that has been donated to sperm banks, all of those times that men screwed their friends' wives that resulted in feeding the divorce courts with fresh meat, all of that money spent on prostitution which could have supported MRAs or prostate cancer research but made abusive pimps rich instead, all of that happened without the knowledge or consent of men, right?