Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

Dalton and Brosnan alike ? What ? Dalton was an established actor long before Brosnan came along. He was considered for Bond in the late ‘60s when he was just in his 20s. Brosnan was more like Roger Moore. But Connery was still the definitive Bond. However, you haven’t had a string of actors playing Kirk, you had Shatner. His “replacement” is anything but up to the task. A teenage-looking, whiny weenie, a Captain Charlie X. Shatner’s Kirk was a MAN. He would’ve slapped that child right out of the center seat.

...and Faux Trek is still Faux Trek.


108 posted on 05/15/2013 9:46:11 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

Dalton got the Bond job because Brosnan wasn’t available. And that wasn’t the first time.

We hadn’t had a string of actors play Kirk YET. If a franchise continues on everybody will get replaced eventually. As for Shatner’s Kirk being a “MAN” I refer you again to “I am Kirok”.

And you’re still full of crap every time you call it faux Trek. It’s just a catchphrase used in place of facts to spur your pointless whining.


109 posted on 05/15/2013 9:48:46 AM PDT by discostu (Not just another moon faced assassin of joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson