Posted on 05/20/2013 6:28:39 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You would think that at the very least the GOP would question irregularities when it comes to the military vote.
Back in November of 2012 there were stories of service members getting their ballots late, or not having their ballots counted.
But who cares? Certainly not the GOP. In a way, calling them the Stupid Party is actually being kind.
But there is plenty more to say! It is not about a stolen election, but a stolen republic and the loss of most free and prosperous civilization in the history of humanity. It is about the pollution of culture, the corruption of character and the eventual fall of the west. No I'm not being hyperbolic and no it didn't start with Obama. A body can tolerate a little toxicity as can a body politic, but the toxicity has been increasing rapidly and the body defense mechanisms have been infected by an auto immune disorder. In fact the IRS scandal is an attack on the production of white blood cells. The body has been attacked from within and the American way of life is perishing fast. What made America great was that she was good, now she is just good at evil.
And wasn't there something in the news prior to the election that a plane had gone down with thousands of ballots from the military? I know the military completely (except for the faggots) despises this pretender and his lard-ass wife, so it's no surprise that absolutely nothing was done to protect the military's ballots.
Yes, I've pointed out on other threads the statistical impossibility of Romney being "shut out" completely in any sizable election precinct, even in predominantly black neighborhoods. Same thing happened in Cleveland precincts. Notice that the shenanigans were deliberately targeted to swing states where the 'Rats thought they could very will lose if they didn't cheat on the vote tallies.
Didn't know about the problems suffered by True the Vote, but they might explain why neither the defrauded Romney campaign nor any Republican organization I know of has yet to complain publicly about the fraud and cheating that occurred on behalf of the 'rats.
The "stealing" of the presidential election was likely accomplished not only by the "traditional" low-tech schemes - e.g., same voter votes multiple times in different locations (aided and abetted by prolonged polling hours due to "early voting" and by "Motor Voter" or same-day registration) or votes both as absentee and in-person, others vote for deceased or moved-out or handicapped people, ineligible voters cast ballots - but also by high-tech hacking into vulnerable electronic voting equipment such as optical scanners and touch screen systems. It was targeted to Democrat dominated cities and counties in the swing states.
BTW, the discrepancies in Obama's favor between the purported vote totals state-by-state and the polling forecasts are much more likely to be caused by this fraud and cheating than by errors in polling technique. In other words, the best pollster in the world can't account for fraud and cheating in his projected results.
The “stealing of the election” was accomplished by traitors within the Republican establishment who diverted conservative efforts.
This effort is exemplified by Romney himself, refusing to meet with Sarah Palin. He wanted to keep her and the Tea Party as far from this election as possible.
THAT is why we lost.
Not to forget the SEIU and the voting machines.
Exactly what you and I have been saying all along.
Seems like we were NOT being “paranoid” after all.
Stealing his
Senate seat was child’s play compared to what he’s learned since.
Yes...will take bloodshed to return to freedom, sadly. The dark cabal took over our nation when they took out JFK...even though he was a democrat..he was conservative in many ways.
What about those who have already voted for his 2016 run?
Except we were never told when nor were shown pictures of the crash. I believe thousands of ballots were destroyed, but not in a plane crash.
Essays on Political Economy (1874)
by M. Frederic Bastiat
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15962/15962-h/15962-h.htm
“Now, legal plunder may be exercised in an infinite multitude of ways. Hence come an infinite multitude of plans for organisation; tariffs, protection, perquisites, gratuities, encouragements, progressive taxation, gratuitous instruction, right to labour, right to profit, right to wages, right to assistance, right to instruments of labour, gratuity of credit, &c., &c. And it is all these plans, taken as a whole, with what they have in common, legal, plunder, which takes the name of socialism.”
Example, if you have 1000 people and 10 are gay, the other 990 are not gay. Yet if the not gays answer normally ~ at 9% ~ they'll account for 90 responses. If the gays answer abnormally, that is all the time, the 10 gays will account for 10 responses.
Simple math. Let's add in unionized school teachers. Then, the abortion industry. You probably have a good 30% of the total responses accounted for by 3 small far leftwing or very special interest groups.
I don't think you can trust Romney's polls ~ the gays liked him eh!
105% turn out at certain precincts, dead registered, digitizing the fraud, intimidating the tea party, busing their welfare voters around with fake voter IDs, stealing boxes of ballots in heavily R precincts...all occurred. And, where exactly is the Republican party?
I do agree that, in general, Democrat voters answer pollsters more frequently than Republicans do. If the pollster doesn't make modifications in his raw data to account for this bias in favor of the Dems, he comes out with a bottom line that overstates the percentage of the vote that the 'Rat candidate will achieve. But this is not what happened in the 2012 presidential election in swing state after swing state. The opposite occurred: usually reliable pollsters underestimated Obama's ultimate reported percentage of the vote. In fact, state after state where Romney was said by pollsters to have led by one, two, or three points was won by Zero (at lest if you believe the reported vote counts). So I don't see how your assumption about Dems being overrepresented in answering pollsters - though probably true in most instances - relates to what actually happened in last year's presidential election.
The most logical way to explain the discrepancy between the polling results and the reported vote totals is that the reported vote totals were effected seriously in Zero's favor by fraud and cheating, factors which no pollster can estimate before the election is completed and ballots are tabulated.
Yes, there could very well have been a serious amount of high-tech fraud going on, like hacking into optical scanners and touch screen equipment to alter the counting of the votes in the 'rats' favor. In jurisdictions where SEIU types service the voting equipment and have custody of it, the risk of this type of cheating is multiplied.
No. IIRC, there is a court decision banning the GOP from fighting vote fraud.
Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee
Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012)
In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
It's not so much Democrats answering polls more frequently ~ it's about subgroups like the NEA, the abortion rights fanatics and the homosexuals answering polls every single time!
That's been happening all along. It's the reason why gay marriage polls show it's popular, but when put to a vote it generally loses.
The only way pollsters can deal with this is to get out of the polling business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.