The fact that his toxicology report shows THC establishes that he was “high” as reported by Zimmerman is all that is needed to establish the fact. The fact he has a photo of pot plants shows that he has a propensity to smoke pot on other occasions. This is clearly not admissible under Rule 404 (B).
I have practiced criminal law for almost 30 years for both prosecution and defense and tried well over 100 criminal jury trials as. I have also served as a judge. No jury will see the pot photos in court.
Good to know. I am not a lawyer and I am ignorant about those things.
Well, if the prosecution argues that his death destroyed the possibility of him making a contribution to society by achieving his dream of becoming a plant and wildlife photographer...
But otherwise, no.
BTW: have you taken a look at how “Profiling” fits into the picture under Florida’s statute?