Posted on 06/19/2013 2:33:54 PM PDT by Lucky9teen
Some dooshbags misunderstood what Beck was saying to start one of his shows. There was no announcement. Period. He spoke too much though about a whistle blower he knew about and people thought he would make a revelation about him the next day because they misunderstand his statement and the following sentences. He was talking about a attempt by the GOP to challenge Boehner on Amnesty and other measures because Boehner is a democrat. That was the revelation he was discussing.
He said he would announce something with in 24 hours and that was not about the whistle blower. He said he didn’t even know the guy well as that guy talked to someone else, but one of his documents could bring down the country. Then he let it go because he said too much. Then he said he had a revelation. It was not about the whistle blower. He was talking about a attempt by the GOP to challenge Boehner on Amnesty and other measures because Boehner is a democrat. The next day that was all he talked about on the show.
I can still listen to Glenn beck even if I disagree with him on gay marriage.
That certainly is the direction things are going. Consider justice in general. Justice today only belongs to whomever holds the monopoly on violence. George Zimmerman is being railroaded on a Murder charge in FLA because the blacks will riot if he walks. So, in your example, eventually the bigger gun will determine the outcome.
There will eventually be marriage-like, state-enforced contracts, but they won't be called marriages, and probably won't be performed in churches. If someone chooses to have a church wedding, they can but it won't be seamless with the state's ability to control contract law.
The big announcement was that 70 rebel republicans caused Tammy Faye Boehner to cave on immigration (successfully so far...we’ll see).
BTW...the morning after the announcement he called people like you dopes.
Thank you for clarifying - very helpful. I have nothing against Beck. I actually like his show, but I never get to watch it due to my schedule.
It was about the 70 members of the House, who signed on and pledged to hold the line to stop Boehner and the House from putting forward an Immigration bill in any form...basically forcing Boehner to follow the Hastert rule. Because they all realize (and know), like we do, that any bill the House puts forward, will be scrapped for the one the Senate puts out, and the Senate bill will be the one voted IN. And then we’ll all get AMNESTY.
It doesn’t seem like a big deal, but in the grand scheme of things, if that bill gets in....we are literally truly doomed as a country. So finding 70 in the House to hold the line and fight back, is a great thing
The only thing I have against him is how he treated Ron Paul during the primaries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.