Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concord: Owners of cocker spaniel shot by police seek apology
Contra Costa Times ^ | Rick Hurd

Posted on 06/26/2013 1:57:05 PM PDT by Morgana

CONCORD -- Two Concord roommates are seeking an explanation as to why a police officer shot their aging cocker spaniel during a neighborhood search for a suspicious person last week.

Zach Grimm and Dave Biller say Kirby, a 13-year-old cocker spaniel, is recovering from a gunshot wound to the shoulder after barking at an officer in the backyard of their home in the 2000 block of Weaver Court on June 17.

But a week after the incident, the two say they have received no explanation from police about why officers were in their yard. Worse, they said, they have not received an apology from the department.

"It's obviously pretty upsetting," said Grimm, 29, who said the dog has been in his family for about 10 years. "The officer who shot at him, after it was over he just sort of had this goofy look on his face, almost like a smirk, and then he left. No explanation, no apology or anything."

Police were in the area around 4:30 p.m. after reports that a person posing as a door-to-door salesman was looking into backyards, according to Concord police Lt. Bill Roche said. In the course of the search, officers entered the backyard of the residence and were confronted by the 29-pound, reddish-brown dog.

(Excerpt) Read more at contracostatimes.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: cockerspaniel; dog; warondogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2013 1:57:06 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I know there’s a T-shirt out there with something like “The cops shot my dog and survived” .....


2 posted on 06/26/2013 1:59:10 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The police are above the law and owe no one an explanation for their actions. They are answerable to themselves and their superiors.


3 posted on 06/26/2013 1:59:44 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
"The officer who shot at him, after it was over he just sort of had this goofy look on his face, almost like a smirk, and then he left. No explanation, no apology or anything."

Soon, very very soon ....

4 posted on 06/26/2013 2:00:03 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

pray I don’t need a /sarc tag, but I’m adding it just in case.


5 posted on 06/26/2013 2:00:03 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Dogs. Cops target practice.


6 posted on 06/26/2013 2:00:15 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

When are cops going realize that every family pet shot, and every “wrong door” kicked erodes their support and authority?
Eventually, there is going to be substantial support for shooting back at the cops.


7 posted on 06/26/2013 2:02:19 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Elderly Cocker Spaniel ping


8 posted on 06/26/2013 2:05:17 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

A cocker spaniel? What a coward!


9 posted on 06/26/2013 2:06:01 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Doggie Ping


10 posted on 06/26/2013 2:07:05 PM PDT by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. ItÂ’s been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Concord police contend that the dog was aggressive enough that the officer perceived a threat and fired once only after a warning was given.

Is this for real?

In what language did the officer deliver this warning? Was it "Bark-bark. Bark. Bark. Bark?" Or was it "BARK-BARK-BARK. Bark... Bark?"

-PJ

11 posted on 06/26/2013 2:10:31 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

keep it up. Eventually you’ll lose the respect of ALL the citizens, not just the criminals.


12 posted on 06/26/2013 2:11:11 PM PDT by I want the USA back (If I Pi$$ed off just one liberal today my mission has been accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
When are cops going realize that every family pet shot, and every “wrong door” kicked erodes their support and authority?
Eventually, there is going to be substantial support for shooting back at the cops.

Looks like the Tea Party may soon be dusting off the old Black Panther slogan, "off the pig!"

13 posted on 06/26/2013 2:11:33 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

They’ll probably get a bill for the bullet.


14 posted on 06/26/2013 2:11:42 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Looks like we need a new slogan

“Don’t come into my yard and shoot my dog. Thank You.”


15 posted on 06/26/2013 2:13:18 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
"The officer determined that the dog was posing enough of a threat that he fired a single round to stop the dog," Roche said.

The department had no other comment. Police did not find the suspicious person.

There has to be a limit to these warrantless searches that the police are doing more and more often.

In this case, the person was just "suspicious," not even someone who was fleeing a crime. And still, the police felt that they were empowered to enter an uninvolved neighbor's private property without permission, and then claim to feel threatened by the animal that lived there, and then to fire their weapon.

This has got to stop.

-PJ

16 posted on 06/26/2013 2:14:57 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; SkyDancer

17 posted on 06/26/2013 2:16:45 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

In NY a police officer can now charge you with a felony if you “harass, annoy, threaten or alarm” an on-duty police officer

They have not been given the right to shoot you using this criteria, YET!

I wonder if there is an honest lawyer (usually mutually exclusive terms, I know) willing to challenge this on a 1st Amendment infringement.

I only agree with the “threaten” assuming it is threatening to do physical harm not “threatening” to sue but the law, like all laws today is so poorly written as to allow the JBTs and ruling elite to do just about anything.


18 posted on 06/26/2013 2:18:25 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam! 969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer
They have not been given the right to shoot you using this criteria, YET!

No, but it is perfectly acceptable to bootlicking public for a thug-scrum of these brave public servants to club your unconscious body half to death while yelling "STOP RESISTING! STOP RESISTING!"

19 posted on 06/26/2013 2:23:25 PM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I’ve spent my entire life cringing when I heard police called ‘pigs’...

Now I understand...


20 posted on 06/26/2013 2:24:39 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson