Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer; xkaydet65
"A reminder, only integrity and self values holds you responsible for your wife’s debts if you are not on her account."

I don't think that is correct. If you live in a community property state like CA and WA you are responsible.

17 posted on 06/29/2013 9:06:42 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky

In my state, if you are not specifically on the account - named as a co-card holder, you are not responsible for the debt. The card company has the action to file suit against the state to collect, however.


18 posted on 06/29/2013 9:08:09 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Spunky
“I don’t think that is correct. If you live in a community property state like CA and WA you are responsible”

Texas is a community property state, however, if a card is only in one person’s name, only that person is responsible. This changed years ago when credit changed to be by individual, not couple. If a spouse has a card only in his/her name, the other spouse is not responsible for that debt because the spouse with the card got the card on the basis of his/her credit, not the spouse’s credit.

If your spouse has a card and you are not on it, the spouse got it with his/her credit, and the spouse runs up a $50,000 bill, you are not responsible.

28 posted on 06/29/2013 9:56:28 AM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson