Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: matginzac

Not only perverse, but ridiculous inasmuch as by 1863 the army on maneuvers was concerned with feeding themselves and finding shoes, including the cavalry (short on horse feed). Hence the capturing of 140 loaded wagons by Stuart. Little to no focus on escaped slaves by that point and on “foreign soil”. Entire claim is silly.


39 posted on 07/04/2013 7:15:24 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby

Totally true and anyone interested in the war’s history would know that and refrain from such a posting.
BTW, I have a gentleman living in my home with me who goes by the name Wade Hampton...named after the famous Confederate cavalry general from SC...my 88 yr old father!


40 posted on 07/04/2013 7:23:01 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby
Entire claim is silly.

But also well documented by Stephen Sears, Noah Andre Trudeau, Ted Alexander, and a host of others. While that was not the purpose of Stuart's ride or the Southern campaign as a whole free blacks were, shall we say, targets of opportunity and an unknown number, possibly in the hundreds, were taken.

42 posted on 07/04/2013 8:44:17 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: John S Mosby
Here is a link to Ted Alexander's article on the subject.
43 posted on 07/04/2013 8:46:41 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson