To: rickmichaels
She doesn't look a day over 13. It sickens me that Polanski continues to get Oscars and other accolades while Jerry Sandusky is the poster boy for evil. What's the difference?
2 posted on
07/24/2013 7:48:16 PM PDT by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: CaptainK
The difference is that Polanski took his fortune and ran to another country. One that thumbs its nose at us because we have cowards in our foreign services.
4 posted on
07/24/2013 7:50:05 PM PDT by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: CaptainK
"She doesn't look a day over 13. It sickens me that Polanski continues to get Oscars and other accolades while Jerry Sandusky is the poster boy for evil. What's the difference?"Whoopi can explain
9 posted on
07/24/2013 7:58:13 PM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: CaptainK
Polanski was very early talent, obviously, and just as obviously went spectacularly off the rails. Who knows what evil. Maybe it was Tate’s murder, which so impressed the weathermen, that made him funny in the head.
The left has a lot to answer for.
13 posted on
07/24/2013 8:05:23 PM PDT by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of Muslim Brotherhood))
To: CaptainK
The difference is that Jerry Sandusky was not a Holocaust survivor who had the nerve to have his family slaughtered in the Land of the Free by our own peace loving hippies!
22 posted on
07/24/2013 8:40:07 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson