Really?
You equate some bimbo posting nude pics of herself with SS records, tax records and birth “certs”?
Ohhhh-Kayyyy then.
It's a property issue. Was the property stolen or wasn't it? If so, a crime was committed. The crime can be litigated in civil court since the statute of limitations has expired legally. The sticky part is... what damages is the criminal liable for?
I expect, being the intelligent, wise and respectful FReeper that you are, you cannot relate to storing nude photos of yourself on your computer. But I would expect there are some things on that machine you would not want to be distributed for any multitude of logical reasons. I simply used an analogy that someone as sophisticated as you might better relate too.
Does that help explain the analogy I used to point out the significance of "property" being stolen?
I did not read that she posted them, I read that they were stolen off of her computer.
She did not post the pics of herself on the internet. The Geek Squad tech took files that were hers from her computer and posted them on the Internet without her permission. It doesn’t matter what the contents of the files were. The tech could have just as easily stolen tax records with her SSN and sold them to identity thieves. They could have taken private emails and posted them online for their entertainment. The point is, it’s wrong no matter what was taken.
You equate some bimbo posting nude pics of herself with SS records, tax records and birth “certs”?
<><><><
You are cracking me up. When the reality of the situation is not juicy enough, you simply make stuff up, exactly as you have done here.
The young woman in question posted exactly nothing of herself anywhere. They were on HER computer. It was the geek squad creep who did the posting.