Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ice is not melting, yet still the scaremongers blunder on
telegraph ^ | 9/21/2013 | Christopher Booker

Posted on 09/25/2013 3:04:55 PM PDT by Signalman

The news that hundreds of scientists and officials from all over the world are this weekend converging on Stockholm to discuss the next 2,000-page report from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) again highlights what is the most terrifying political conundrum facing our country today. Emerging in instalments over the next seven months, this report will try to convince the world, without a shred of hard evidence, that the prospect of catastrophic man-made global warming is “extremely likely”.

The air is already thick with familiar claims and counterclaims, President Obama quotes yet another laughably silly paper trying to make out that “97 per cent of scientists” support the IPCC “consensus”. Sceptics point out yet again that the lack of global warming over the past 17 years makes a nonsense of all those computer-model projections on which the IPCC has been basing its case for 23 years. And we can only look on this endlessly sterile non-debate with a suffocating sense of déjà vu.

In essence, the argument has not moved on an iota since 2009, when I published what is still the fullest historical account of this greatest scare story the world has known, in a book called The Real Global Warming Disaster. Even then, it was abundantly clear that the IPCC’s computer-model projections were being disproved by what was actually happening to world temperatures. It was already clear that not one of those predictions being made by Al Gore and others in the days when the warming hysteria was at its height was coming true.

This very weekend of September 2013, we were being told back in 2007, would be the moment when the Arctic was “ice-free”. Yet this summer’s ice-melt has been the smallest in seven years,

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: agw; globalcooling; scam

1 posted on 09/25/2013 3:04:55 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

there’s too much money to be stolen


2 posted on 09/25/2013 3:05:55 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
 photo polarbear_zps3219c746.jpeg

 photo Knutt1_zps7b0bea08.jpeg

 photo Knutt2_zps7e2fa13e.jpeg

3 posted on 09/25/2013 3:18:29 PM PDT by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

For Al Gore, that’s some pretty unsettling settled science.


4 posted on 09/25/2013 3:21:50 PM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
 photo stop-global-warming-cartoon.gif
5 posted on 09/25/2013 3:46:04 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

I love the comments sections on British sites. Only here do you see derision condensed into such gems as “You pompous beligerent sock!”

Comedy gold.


6 posted on 09/25/2013 4:03:54 PM PDT by Heavyrunner (Socialize this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner

Good stuff, thanks!


7 posted on 09/25/2013 4:18:50 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: william clark

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls our climates.

3. The earth is a rock.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


8 posted on 09/25/2013 5:24:59 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
It was already clear that not one of those predictions being made by Al Gore and others in the days when the warming hysteria was at its height was coming true.

I can't understand why the warming lobby are not embarrassed.

9 posted on 09/25/2013 5:36:03 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
I can't understand why the warming lobby are not embarrassed.

IMO it's because this isn't about the science to them, or (in)accurate computer models, or evidence. It is about a cause. Limbaugh called it a religion a long time ago and I thought he was going overboard. For some of these folks it truly is a religion. Damn the evidence, they won't be convinced that their cause is foolish and cannot be substantiated by the full range of facts. Others, like Gore and a lot of these IPCC guys, have a greater interest in gaining influence and money.

10 posted on 09/26/2013 6:31:10 AM PDT by opus86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson