To: SunkenCiv; An.American.Expatriate
Pre-Columbian would be the correct term in this case.
IMO
21 posted on
10/20/2013 7:24:28 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: BenLurkin; An.American.Expatriate
The remains are *also* PreColumbian, and unless and until someone finds writing associated with the site they are accurately described as prehistoric.
26 posted on
10/20/2013 9:22:26 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson