Posted on 10/24/2013 6:14:50 PM PDT by markomalley
If it’s the company’s computer, that is their right.
It sounds like they are confusing Hacking with Cracking.
http://www.geek.com/forums/topic/hacking-and-cracking/
you do not need special skills to destroy evidence quickly. just a screw driver and a hammer.
software is a black art to most of society. hell, most of them are mystified by the mouse
meanwhile, it would make sense to never be w-2 with any company... just subcontract and be done with it
LOL...wrong thread...
Well, it wasn’t their computer so it isn’t their right.
But they got an ignorant judge to sign off on it so there you go.
Is that Lindsey Graham in the very back?
You don’t even really need those tools if you have a rare earth magnet to throw on your drive.
A$$holes. The word “Hacker” means a person who spends a lot of time at the computer, working to get a program to work. When the media first heard the word several years ago, naturally it didn’t understand it, and gave it the meaning of “person trying to break into a computer.”
They still are a$$holes.
In this context, I’m not sure there is a functional difference between a cracker and a hacker.
The person is publicly declaring he has the necessary skill set to do either, and that’s what the argument came down to: Did he have the ability, and was he likely to do more damage to the company with what was on his computer, then cover the tracks? He says he did and he was, so it was reasonable to take him at his word.
This case covers some novel ground because, as the article states, it doesn’t meet the legal test for a restraining order. Maybe the Judge thought that a declaration of “being a hacker” was sufficient historical behavior?
Not sure, but Obama is driving.
I’ve got an old hard drive here on the shelf that I took out of the computer when it went to hell and I dumped the computer at an electronics store.
Doesn't have to be if it's their Intellectual Property on it.
Fully automatic assault computer Hacker.
I have a couple, too. I ordered an adapter so I can copy their images through a USB port. I suppose I’ll get on that project this weekend...
“Doesn’t have to be if it’s their Intellectual Property on it. “
But how do they know/prove that it is their intellectual property on it?
You need probable cause for a search. They can’t just go fishing around someone’s hard drive to see what they can find.
But apparently bragging that one is a skilled computer programmer is enough probable cause for an ill informed judge.
so anyone can spoof an email from you with you saying you’re a hacker and there goes your cmputers. great.
LMAO! No, it applies to each and every thread!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.