Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: noprogs; ColdOne; KC_Lion; boxlunch; Jack Black; Nowhere Man; Kevmo; Nea Wood; ...
Secession and Anti-Secession Ping and Prayer list
Stories and commentary both for and against secession.

To be added or taken off this list, please send a FR mail to RKBA Democrat. DISCLOSURE: I'm ANTI-secession in the case of states seceding from the union, but I'll attempt to administer the ping and prayer list fairly for seceshers, ejectors, and anti-seceshers of Good Will. Search the keyword "secessionlist" to see previous articles and pings.

2 posted on 10/30/2013 2:00:48 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( There is no worst president but owebama, and valerie jarrett is his prophet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RKBA Democrat

There’s a commentator called “tobias” at the Salon.com post entitled “just secede already”, which is just brilliant. He makes the argument that the only reason secession seems reasonable is because we have killed federalism, cut its head off, pounded a stake through its heart, and buried it at the crossroads:

Tobias
10 days ago

Hang on. Maybe there’s a solution to this problem that would avoid succession.

We’re talking about such a big country with wildly diverse interests, needs, history, traditions, environments and populations. So what if we divided the country into smaller, more manageable units that would be largely self-governing in terms of the day-to-day lives of their citizens. Then people would feel like they had greater control over how they are governed and they wouldn’t feel like they are being dictated to by people who don’t share their values or whose needs and interests are very different. We could call these units something like “States.” We could even allow these States to further subdivide themselves if they find it necessary.

But then, we could also take advantage of the economies of scale that flow from such a large population by pooling some resources to create a unified system of trade and common defense amongst and between the states. We could have one military to defend us and free inter-state commerce. Also, we could allow citizens of different states to live and move freely within these states if they chose.

It seems to me that such a system of united states would produce far less friction and animosity that a large, overarching government that sought increasing control over the daily lives of such a diverse population. Just a thought.


24 posted on 10/30/2013 2:55:41 PM PDT by altsehastiin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson