Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AR-15 80% lower question
me | 11-2-13 | TZ

Posted on 11/02/2013 10:06:47 AM PDT by TurboZamboni

So if someone theoretically has an 80% lower(for personal ownership/use only) and could find a machinist to finish the 20%, is the machinist or owner of the lower in violation of any federal goobermint laws?

If not, is there a place to find and print chapter and verse as proof of this?

If the the theoretical owner were to press the "start" button on a programmed CNC machine, would the theoretical owner then be considered the maker/manufacturer?


TOPICS: Hobbies
KEYWORDS: 80; ar15; atf; banglist; guncontrol; lower; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: TurboZamboni

As someone who might have theoretically built an AK before, the answers above are correct.

Find an AR build party in your area and do the work as a group. You will find someone with the tools and experience to show YOU how to do it.


21 posted on 11/02/2013 11:10:08 AM PDT by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Registered?

Theoretically I am a registered terrorists

US Army Veteran.


22 posted on 11/02/2013 11:14:46 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni; All
 photo piersmoganar30.png

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


23 posted on 11/02/2013 11:16:13 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

You must finish the work yourself.

I’ll try to send you a company in California who makes 80%’s.

Their instructions are unbelievably easy.

A caveman could do it.

gimme an hour and when I get home I’ll get you their link.


24 posted on 11/02/2013 11:18:48 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

There is a 200 dollar tax that you have to pay when you make a weapon. Failure to pay that tax is a crime. Possession of an untaxed weapon is an element toward proof of the crime.


25 posted on 11/02/2013 11:37:06 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar will soon be repeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I refer you to ATF Form 1


26 posted on 11/02/2013 11:39:35 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar will soon be repeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
27 posted on 11/02/2013 12:11:55 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EandH Dad
I found that store in Bailey, CO a few weeks back... add in Medical Marijuana... the place is undoubtedly Party City.


28 posted on 11/02/2013 12:13:59 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I have an 80% lower and as I understand it, once the piece is milled it must be registered

Only in an unfree state!

You see, folks, what the media does? It's got FREEPERS believing they have to register their guns! Good grief!

29 posted on 11/02/2013 12:19:48 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker; All
There is a 200 dollar tax that you have to pay when you make a weapon. Failure to pay that tax is a crime. Possession of an untaxed weapon is an element toward proof of the crime.

PLEASE PLEASE! Do NOT give out firearms advice if you don't know what you're talking about! You can be convicted of a FEDERAL Felony!

No, 80% lowers are NOT for NFA weapons, so therefore, NO TAX has to be paid on them.

30 posted on 11/02/2013 12:23:24 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
FORM 1 ONLY APPLIES TO NFA WEAPONS!

An 80% lower is not capable of selective fire.

And I don't have any shoestrings, rubber bands, or rubber washers, either, Mr. ATF snitch.

31 posted on 11/02/2013 12:24:51 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

I think you are considering class III firearms, which are fully auto or short barreled rifles or shotguns, and a few others.

Silencers or suppressors are also included.

You do not have to ask the BATFE for permission to manufacture a firearm unless it is a class III or if you are making them to sell them.


32 posted on 11/02/2013 12:46:00 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Will they franchise to East Tennessee?


33 posted on 11/02/2013 12:48:55 PM PDT by EandH Dad (sleeping giants wake up REALLY grumpy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

The piece was purchased in California as a paper weight (more of a conversation piece) for the time being. The store owner said once it was milled it had to be registered. I don’t know what California law says but I have no plans of registering it here.


34 posted on 11/02/2013 1:04:54 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
"Theoretically then a drill press would be a good investment."

A good set of scuba equipment would be better, what with all the recent boating accidents.

35 posted on 11/02/2013 1:07:55 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
There's a lot to be said for having an AR that (legally) has no markings on it. Here's one I recently finished.

 photo arbuild01_zps96e0f5f1.jpg

This is a very timely topic and is in a state of flux right now. The BATFE is cracking down big time on "build parties" in California and since they do not enforce California law but federal law I expect it will be seen elsewhere. I tried to find the thread and references on Calguns.net but they seem to have disappeared which tends to happens when to much information is given or strategy revealed.

Anyway, the background. The rifle above is legal as it sits, even in California, as long as it does not have a magazine with a capacity of greater that 10 rounds inserted. You cannot see it but on the other side it has a magazine lock, known popularly as a "bullet button" that requires a "tool" to release the magazine. After December 31 of this year this rifle would have to be registered when finished. You can still build one yourself but you have to send a "voluntary registration" with the DROS fee and I am uncertain but would assume it needs a serial number to be registered. Naturally this spiked a lot of interest in building AR's before the cutoff date. Rifles owned before the registration requirement are grandfathered and need not be registered, similar to handguns legally possessed in California prior to 1991.

Thus arose the "build party" where 10 or so guys would buy an 80% receiver and get together at someone's house who owned a drill press or a mill and learn how to finish the receiver and assemble the rifle. Then some machine shops saw an opportunity to make some money and started "renting" time on a CNC mill. The mill would have the program loaded and the buildee would push the start button, which was held to be the operation that finished the receiver.

Soon people were lined up outside the doors of these shops and as anyone who has had dealings with the BATFE (I had a Class 1 & Class 6 FFL in the eighties) would tell you, they weren't going to stand for that. One shop, as I recall it was ARES in San Diego, was made the example of and raided and shut down. Then a "cease and desist" letter was sent to the other shops that had been doing the same thing and they stopped and the rest soon followed. According to the legal eagles who have analyzed it the BATFE is concerned about "for profit" manufacturing by entities without a Class 7 license and SOT cranking out unserialized weapons with no paperwork that may be in the possession of prohibited persons. They now look at where the machines used to finish are located and who owns the machines and the premises they are located in. So going to a machine shop and pushing a button to finish a receiver may now constitute a violation of Federal law.

But building one for yourself with you own skills remains completely legal under GCA 68. You can buy one of the new polymer 80% receivers like EP Lowers sells and use a Dremel tool to remove the color coded polymer and there you go. Or you can buy a polymer 80% that comes with an one time use jig and finish it with a drill press. Or if you have a friend with a Bridgeport 0304 in his garage, as I do, who will instruct you in how to run the machine and you manually mill it yourself, as I did and no money changes hands then it's presumably legal.

The finished receiver cannot be transferred to anyone unless you mark it. There are detailed requirements on the markings and as I recall they must include the builders name, city and state and a unique serial number. The marking must be a minimum of 3/16" high and .003" deep but that's only what I remember and you should check to be sure before embarking on that course of action. Also the receiver (or rifle) cannot be sold for profit.

36 posted on 11/02/2013 1:19:36 PM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Having completed many PCR-80 lowers you should do the work yourself. While you may give the PCR-80 lower to the machinist, when he returns it to you it is no longer a PCR-80 and is considered a firearm.

You will have to remove it from the machine only.


37 posted on 11/02/2013 1:42:49 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yes, you are right. Class III firearms, was what I researched, some 10 years ago. I forgot that qualification when responding to the post.

Sorry team.


38 posted on 11/04/2013 10:55:27 AM PST by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar will soon be repeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

No probem. The only people who never make a mistake are those who do nothing. And that is the biggest mistake that they can make.


39 posted on 11/04/2013 11:29:31 AM PST by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

See! I just misspelled problem. The “L” key doesn’t work on that keyboard... I had to retrieve a different one.


40 posted on 11/04/2013 11:30:42 AM PST by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson