Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teenager dies aboard Delta flight soon after takeoff from Seattle
NBC ^ | Simon Moya-Smith

Posted on 12/07/2013 2:33:36 PM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: BenLurkin

I take that same SEATAC-ATL flight multiple times a year.

I’ll say a prayer next time I’m aboard.


41 posted on 12/07/2013 4:14:33 PM PST by Alas Babylon! (Joe Wilson was dead on! Expunge his censor or censor Pelosi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Wrong or right he’s just as dead


42 posted on 12/07/2013 4:29:27 PM PST by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

He may not have been that drugged up. He may have swallows a balloon full of heroin to smuggle it to Atlanta. If the balloon broke in his stomach (or elsewhere), death would have been pretty fast.


43 posted on 12/07/2013 6:18:39 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Have a wonderful day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
You are way off base there. I helped out with my kids teams; attended many practices; refereed; attended all league events; went to team get togethers and parents' meetings. For parents involved with their kids' sports, it is ANYTHING BUT a babysitter. It is an investment in building your kids' character, integrity, determination, grit, drive, and perseverance.

Character, integrity, grit, drive and perseverance do come from parents. But they can get those same things in the scouts, church groups, day camps, school--as well as in sports teams.

One of the worst experience for kids is to be too small, too tall or not good enough for said teams. Then, they end up hating sports all their lives. Sometimes parents have to force their children to get off the couch.

I've seen SO many working parents (dump off) leave off their children for the babysitter, scouts, day camps, schools, whatever. Their cars line up and stack up in front of the schools dumping off their little treasures and THEY drive off to their own jobs. Perhaps it might be better if the parents spent more time with their children rather than putting them into all kinds of sports camps.

Sport camps are VERY American. Sports are SO important here as they have a lock on the major campuses, television and our world class athletes. We are the ONLY country on planet earth who give university SCHOLARSHIPS to students for being able to bounce and/or hit a ball, not for intellectual achievement, but for being able to hit a ball.

However, I DO get your point. For those parents who are 100% into their children's sports, there is no babysitting involved. The screaming, angry, frustrated parents at kids' games is almost a cliche.

44 posted on 12/07/2013 6:32:17 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Seattle

Teenager

Suddenly Dead

Heroin'd be my guess.

45 posted on 12/07/2013 6:36:41 PM PST by riri (Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
Yes, of course, but it was pretty much limited to degenerate skid-row adults. When I went off to the Univ. of Tennessee, back in 1963, no one mentioned, much less used, drugs. We did, however, drink a lot. Maybe you lived in a different society.

I was off to the University of California in 1964. There was ALL kinds of stuff. I got more "education" watching all the political happenings than I did in classes. Lots of drugs there. The mantra of the '60 was: drugs, sex and rock and roll. You remember that too.

I came home on the weekends as my father was ill. He didn't live quite long enough to see me graduate. HE was far, far more important than whatever was going on at the campus.

46 posted on 12/07/2013 6:51:22 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The answer to your question is yes. People with aneurysm’s are advised against flying for example.


47 posted on 12/07/2013 6:59:48 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Controlling drugs is all about money. Always has been.

Almost all of our narcotics come from south of the border. Controlling the drugs is far more complicated than pricing them as high as possible. ENFORCING the drug laws is the missing link. EASY to make a ton of laws; not so easy to enforce them. There is WAY too much money and far too many governments involved in the entire industry.

There simply IS no easy, pat answer. Never has been; never will be. People will continue to use drugs, legal or not, because they haven't the wherewithal to face life without a crutch. Not much has changed since Adam and Eve.

48 posted on 12/07/2013 7:01:28 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain
There simply IS no easy, pat answer. Never has been; never will be. People will continue to use drugs, legal or not, because they haven't the wherewithal to face life without a crutch. Not much has changed since Adam and Eve.

There is an easy answer. Over the counter sales of any drug should be legal at every drug store in the country. If you want a pharmacy license there is a list of drugs you must stock. If the customer can spell it, he can buy it.

This would take a huge bite out of crime at every level. Starve the cartels into submission. I don't think more people would take up drugs. No enormous profits, no easy living for dealers, no one to push drugs on young kids. Sure, they will do it on their own, but fewer than with the system we have now.

Crimes to get money for drugs would fall with the price of drugs. No more million dollar payoffs which easily corrupt border patrol and customs officials.

All in all, many fewer lives ruined by drugs...

49 posted on 12/07/2013 7:59:41 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Most would totally disagree.

Kids especially cannot be allowed to buy any drug at any time as you suggest


50 posted on 12/07/2013 8:00:59 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

” The mantra of the ‘60 was: drugs, sex and rock and roll. You remember that too. “
________________________________________________
No, I remember only whiskey, sex, and rock and roll, and the sex was more talk then real. This was in the south. I am sure California was different.
The fact that I never had an interest in drugs may be clouding my memory. I have smoked only one joint in my life, and that would have been in the 70s.


51 posted on 12/07/2013 8:08:43 PM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
NO drugs? None at all?! In the South? In the 70's?

I DON'T believe it.

52 posted on 12/07/2013 9:02:15 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Starve the cartels into submission.

Lol. You ought to be on television. The cartels ... starve them into submission. The cartels...a few US laws and the world's drug cartels will be subdued. I think your curls have gone to your brain, CD.

You have no idea of the powah of the dark side....oooops, I'm sliding into Star Wars and Darth Vader.

Honestly, I have SEEN (only seen) the Mafia in Las Vegas. I even saw one of their hit men hiding out in Saudi Arabia. Scary guy. My husband said he had "dead eyes."

I seriously doubt if the world's leaders of the drug cartels are going to pay ANY ATTENTION to a few drug laws that are made in SOME states by SOME legislators. The Feds won't made that law for all the states...they can't.

There is simply WAY too much money in illegal drugs for the US to handle...especially ESPECIALLY since Americans are the BIGGEST MARKET FOR DRUGS ON THE PLANET.

53 posted on 12/07/2013 9:10:10 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

“NO drugs? None at all?! In the South? In the 70’s?”
_______________________________________________________
No one ask you to believe anything. I only report how life was in my circles. I knew a few that had access to weed, but I did not know anyone, or hear of anyone that did anything harder. Oh, but I did take a few Dexamils at university, only to stay awake and study for exams. No one took drugs for a buzz.


54 posted on 12/07/2013 10:13:44 PM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sad. RIP.


55 posted on 12/07/2013 11:49:21 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson