Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anyone else hear? TEPCO Quietly Admits Reactor 3 Could Be Melting Down NOW [see post 80']
Susan posel news ^ | Dec 30, 2013 | Turner Radio Network

Posted on 12/30/2013 9:07:12 AM PST by RaceBannon

Turner Radio Network (TRN) has issued a report regarding Fukushima Diachi Nuclear Plant that is expected to affect the entire Northern Hemisphere. According to the report: “Persons residing on the west coast of North America should IMMEDIATELY begin preparing for another possible onslaught of dangerous atmospheric radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster site in Japan.” TEPCO has confirmed that via camera surveillance, that steam has begun to pour from Reactor 3, although they have “not been identified abnormal plant conditions.” TEPCO are reporting that “radioactive steam has suddenly begun emanating from previously exploded nuclear reactor building #3 at the Fukuishima disaster site in Japan.”


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fukushima; fukushimameltdown; japan; nuclear; nuke; overreactor; radiation; reactor; tepco; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: gunsequalfreedom

You are advocating for the enemy.


41 posted on 12/30/2013 9:31:31 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Tepco (translation), Dec. 27, 2013: At around 7:00 am on December 27, and confirmed by the camera that from Unit 3 reactor building, 5th floor near the center, steam is generated. Have not been identified abnormal plant conditions of 54 minutes at 7:00 am the same day, the indicated value of the monitoring post (meteorological data of 50 minutes at 7:00 am, 5.1 ℃ temperature, 93.1% humidity).

Tepco (translation), Dec. 25, 2013: At around 7:00 am on December 25, and confirmed by the camera that from Unit 3 reactor building, 5th floor near the center, steam is generated. Have not been identified abnormal plant conditions of 8:00 am the same day time, the indicated value of the monitoring post (meteorological data of 50 minutes at 7:00 am, 2.8 ℃ temperature, 76.7% humidity).

Tepco (translation), Dec. 24, 2013: At around 7:00 am on December 19, and confirmed by the camera that from Unit 3 reactor building, 5th floor near the center, steam is generated. Have not been identified abnormal plant conditions of 55 minutes at 7:00 am the same day, the indicated value of the monitoring post (meteorological data of 40 minutes at 7:00 am, 5.6 ℃ temperature, 93.7% humidity). Then, in 58 minutes around 7:00 am December 24, steam is no longer observed. It should be noted, have not been identified abnormal plant conditions in a 3-minute time at 8:00 am the same day, the indicated value monitoring posts, etc. (meteorological data of 50 minutes at 7:00 am, 4.1 ℃ temperature, 74.9% humidity).

Useful Radiation Monitoring Site Links:

http://www.netc.com/

http://www.radiationnetwork.com/

42 posted on 12/30/2013 9:34:52 AM PST by Errant (Surround yourself with intelligent and industrious people who help and support each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Will this threaten the US before or after the remains of Ison hit?


43 posted on 12/30/2013 9:37:53 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

No, not really. A ‘meltdown’ is not really nuclear fission oriented. It is HEAT oriented. Reactor fuel, after shut down, and sub-critical- generates heat from decay of radioactive fission products, hence the need for post shutdowwn cooling and fuel pools.


44 posted on 12/30/2013 9:43:57 AM PST by RoadGumby (This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

This is the most under-reported story of the year, and it contains the potential for more damage than anyone is considering possible.

Massive radioactivity in the air, in the ground, and in the ocean, the currents for which come straight to the US and Canadian West Coast.

They are dumping contaminated radioactive water into the ocean by the ton.

I think those old Japanese monster movies will be coming out of mothballs soon.

An our American press is not even interested. Does it not make all of those environmentalist types even wonder as much as they do about global warming? How about global glowing?


45 posted on 12/30/2013 9:46:03 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby

I understand that- but it generates its own sustained heat from the critical mass.

If that melting stuff was seperated it would no only dissapate all that heat but go below critical mass.

All the ‘meltdown’ scenarios depict the blob of melted matter staying together until it melts to the core of the earth. - and when it hits the water table the steam and possible pressure build up would be catastrophic

I am wondering it it would spread out and cool itself down


46 posted on 12/30/2013 9:49:03 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Why would they? In order to profit Soros and Obama, they dumped tons of untested chemicals into the Gulf during the oil leak. Seafood on the Gulf Coast is still tainted.


47 posted on 12/30/2013 9:49:45 AM PST by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

I remember the coverage of Chernobyl. Non-stop, lots of sources, many expert talking heads.

This disaster, nothing.

I think the point of this is we have a right to know what is really happening from the Japanese Government and from what the American government knows.

There are no watchdogs minding the store. Why would Obama allow the press to investigate this if it would make him look bad, ineffective, and uncaring? After all, it would spark a debate in this country, and he may be asked for his opinion on nuclear power.

Maybe they are saving it for the false flag...


48 posted on 12/30/2013 9:52:28 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Love your tag...


49 posted on 12/30/2013 9:53:29 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

You are correct.


50 posted on 12/30/2013 9:55:39 AM PST by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

While the Fukushima sites represent a valid concern for the local population, they hardly represent a danger to “the entire Northern Hemisphere”

All of the following should be considered warnings of an inaccurate article:

- Global disaster
- Use of terms of uncertainty (possible, maybe, etc)
- Non-standard source

I expect more from Freepers.


51 posted on 12/30/2013 10:01:15 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Critical mass implies that there is sufficient mass of fissile material to attain criticality. The heat generated has nought to do with criticality.

It generates heat from gamma and beta decays of all the fission products. Not mass. Heat generated per unit volume doesnt change, regardless of the number of units of volume you may have.


52 posted on 12/30/2013 10:07:17 AM PST by RoadGumby (This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

This was also on the Nuclear Emergency Tracking Center website. (www.netc.com) buried in the news forum/ nuclear news/ urgent news flash. According to Dutchsinse (www.dutchsinse.com) who follows this along with weather modification and earthquake watches, the photo used with this article was from last march, and a video I watched at youtube last night regarding this report has been deleted as of this morning. However, the bigger problem that I see here is that a lot of the EPA radiation site collectors seem either missing or unreliable as per my own research. There is a LOT more about all of this at the EnergyNewsOnline. (www.enenews.com)


53 posted on 12/30/2013 10:08:24 AM PST by Norski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: LachlanMinnesota

Thank you. I keep thinking of changing it, but cannot think up one better.


55 posted on 12/30/2013 10:13:00 AM PST by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby

“fission”

It is also dependent of purity, which at this point is questionable. And I think the entire MX system is to prevent that. And prevent it ever being used as weapons grade again.


56 posted on 12/30/2013 10:16:14 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Most FReepers now avoid these threads. It’s just a handful of the same people again and again. People love their doses of fear mongering.


57 posted on 12/30/2013 10:17:08 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby

huh?

The heat comes FROM the nuclear material generating its own heat. And that only happens if there is enough material in close proximity togther to start reactions.

That is how a nuclear reactor works. They put rods of material cose together so they will generate heat. They seperate these rods od material with control rods, that block the reaction. (this is simplified and you probable know this, i am just pointing out so others will understand what us nerds are talking about)

They generate more or less heat by raising and lowering the control rods

So.. when a meltdown occurs there was so much heat the material melts and pools together, making it even worse.

So, the heat generated exponentially increases. It is 100% related to the mass of the material

I am missine your point. What do you think sustains the heat for a continuing meltdown if not the mass of the material?

I grant that I may be mis-using the term ‘critical’ it may mean critical as in enough to explode.


58 posted on 12/30/2013 10:18:35 AM PST by Mr. K (If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Perhaps...but they had the latest report on the U.S.S. Reagan sailors two weeks before it was on Fox. I AM keeping an eye on fukishima..it has never been contained..or stopped. Nearly 3 years and counting...


59 posted on 12/30/2013 10:18:48 AM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I’ll keep an eye on Debka and TMZ.


60 posted on 12/30/2013 10:22:27 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson