To: Cruz_West_Paul2016
The reason they changed it from "global warming" to "climate change" is because they're not sure of the sign of the effect, i.e. heating or cooling. (Hey, the models aren't that good.) But they are sure that we caused it and they need to both tax us and expand their own power for doing so.
4 posted on
01/04/2014 5:03:46 PM PST by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: coloradan; Cruz_West_Paul2016
>>
The reason they changed it from “global warming” to “climate change” is because they’re not sure of the sign of the effect, i.e. heating or cooling. (Hey, the models aren’t that good.) But they are sure that we caused it and they need to both tax us and expand their own power for doing so. <<
Hotter? climate change
Colder? climate change
Milder (last hurricane season)? climate change
No discernible change? climate change
Until 25 years ago, the Earth was in a steady state with no long-term cooling or warming trends, ya see...
8 posted on
01/04/2014 5:10:14 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
To: coloradan
I think that you are right, bigger government.
15 posted on
01/04/2014 5:14:22 PM PST by
ANGGAPO
(Layte Gulf Beach Club)
To: coloradan
The reason they changed it from "global warming" to "climate change" is because they're not sure of the sign of the effect, i.e. heating or cooling. (Hey, the models aren't that good.) But they are sure that we caused it and they need to both tax us and expand their own power for doing so. And, in order to discount how the models they used over the last 25 years have been wrong, they now move the claims of pending disaster out 100 years so nobody ever gets to see how wrong they are...
42 posted on
01/05/2014 5:43:00 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson