Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

This thing was worse than my worst fears. Just awful. They had no voice, no message, no audience in mind. It does not rise to the level of hokey. An embarrassment, and worse, a wasted opportunity.

Carl Sagan was a good scientist and a great salesman. His vision, his message drove the original Cosmos. Dr. Tyson probably did as well as could be expected given the material, but he is very much a lesser epigone of Sagan. Great special effects and computer graphics in the service of a muddled and confused message. The fancy-schmatzy computer graphics added to the confusion and detracted from whatever message they thought they had. The cheesy “Also Sprach Zarathustra” Musik didn’t help, either. If you watched the first episode you know less about the cosmos than before.

Four rotten tomatoes. In case I wasn’t clear, I HATED IT.


102 posted on 03/10/2014 4:19:51 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (In the long run, we are all dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Clearly written by Brian the dog.


103 posted on 03/10/2014 10:18:35 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets; All

The cartoons used to describe some of our best astronomers of the past was, (imo), juvenile kids stuff..! As a (former) amateur astronomer I was greatly disappointed in his presentation.

(Did you see the prelude to the show? Why it was our current commander in chief himself, BHO!)


107 posted on 03/10/2014 5:19:58 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (The democRATic party preys on the ignorant..!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson