Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Morosi: The rule change that saved baseball — in an instant [instant replay]
FOX Sports ^ | Jan. 17, 2014 | Jon Paul Morosi

Posted on 01/17/2014 9:44:37 AM PST by 1rudeboy

In a trying month for baseball, this was a good day.

For much of the week, it seemed as if Alex Rodriguez was intent on shattering two decades of relative peace in our national pastime. But here was one achievement even Rodriguez couldn’t smear: Major League Baseball, the MLB Players Association, and the World Umpires Association decided — collectively — to expand instant replay, and they did it the right way.

It took years of thoughtful evolution on the issue — from commissioner Bud Selig and others — and then months of intense work from the triumvirate of John Schuerholz, Joe Torre and Tony La Russa, and MLB executives Peter Woodfork and Chris Marinak.

The best part? As MLB officials spoke during a Thursday news conference, they did so with complete candor about the system’s strengths and limitations.

It is not perfect, they cautioned. It could (and probably will) change after the first year. The game will be fairer, because umpires have more resources to get calls right, and more transparent, because fans inside stadiums will see the same replays as the umpires when calls are challenged.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.foxsports.com ...


TOPICS: Society; Sports
KEYWORDS: baseball; instantreplay; mlb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: gopno1; Perdogg; AuH2ORepublican; campaignPete R-CT; GeronL; darkangel82; NFHale; GOPsterinMA

I HATE the “neighborhood” play. Hate.

So now it will apparently be up to the whims of the umpire to determine whether a runner coming home is “targeting the catcher” or not. Yay. Not.


41 posted on 02/25/2014 9:40:58 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Impy

One good thing about the rule change is that supposedly prohibits catchers from blocking the plate without the ball. Of course, it already was supposed to be against the rules, but it hasn’t been enforced in decades.


42 posted on 02/26/2014 4:22:43 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Impy; gopno1; Perdogg; AuH2ORepublican; darkangel82; NFHale

Gay. Very gay.


43 posted on 02/26/2014 4:48:21 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson